Warner K E, Goldenhar L M, McLaughlin C G
School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.
N Engl J Med. 1992 Jan 30;326(5):305-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199201303260505.
Health professionals have charged that magazines that depend on revenues from cigarette advertising are less likely to publish articles on the dangers of smoking for fear of offending cigarette manufacturers. Special concern has focused on magazines directed to women. Restricted coverage of smoking hazards could lead readers to underestimate the risks of smoking in relation to other health risks.
Using logistic-regression analysis of a sample of 99 U.S. magazines published during 25 years (1959 through 1969 and 1973 through 1986), we analyzed the probability that the magazines would publish articles on the risks of smoking in relation to whether they carried advertisements for cigarettes and in relation to the proportion of their advertising revenues derived from cigarette advertisements. We controlled for other factors that might influence coverage.
The probability of publishing an article on the risks of smoking in a given year was 11.9 percent for magazines that did not carry cigarette advertisements, as compared with 8.3 percent for those that did publish such advertisements (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.42 to 1.30). For women's magazines alone, the probabilities were 11.7 percent and 5.0 percent, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 0.13; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.69). When the proportion of revenues derived from cigarette advertising was the independent variable, the probability of publishing an article on the risks of smoking in a given year was reduced by 38 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 18 percent to 55 percent) for magazines with the average proportion of total advertising revenues derived from cigarette advertising for the entire sample of magazines (6 percent) as compared with magazines with no cigarette advertising. This relation was particularly strong in the case of women's magazines. An increase of 1 percent in the share of advertising revenue derived from cigarette advertisements decreased the probability of covering the risks of smoking by three times as much as in other magazines.
This study provides strong statistical evidence that cigarette advertising in magazines is associated with diminished coverage of the hazards of smoking. This is particularly true for magazines directed to women.
健康专家指责,依赖香烟广告收入的杂志不太可能刊登有关吸烟危害的文章,因为担心冒犯香烟制造商。人们特别关注面向女性的杂志。对吸烟危害的报道受限可能会导致读者低估吸烟相对于其他健康风险的风险。
我们对25年间(1959年至1969年以及1973年至1986年)出版的99种美国杂志样本进行逻辑回归分析,分析这些杂志刊登有关吸烟风险文章的概率与它们是否刊登香烟广告以及来自香烟广告的广告收入比例之间的关系。我们控制了其他可能影响报道的因素。
在某一年不刊登香烟广告的杂志刊登有关吸烟风险文章的概率为11.9%,而刊登此类广告的杂志这一概率为8.3%(调整后的优势比为0.73;95%置信区间为0.42至1.30)。仅就女性杂志而言,这两个概率分别为11.7%和5.0%(调整后的优势比为0.13;95%置信区间为0.02至0.69)。当以来自香烟广告的收入比例作为自变量时,与没有香烟广告的杂志相比,对于整个杂志样本中来自香烟广告的总广告收入平均比例(6%)的杂志,在某一年刊登有关吸烟风险文章的概率降低了38%(95%置信区间为18%至55%)。这种关系在女性杂志中尤为明显。来自香烟广告的广告收入份额每增加1%,报道吸烟风险的概率降低幅度是其他杂志的三倍。
这项研究提供了有力的统计证据,表明杂志中的香烟广告与吸烟危害报道的减少有关。对于面向女性的杂志尤其如此。