Chivukula Mamatha, Saad Reda S, Elishaev Esther, White Susan, Mauser Nancy, Dabbs David J
Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Cytojournal. 2007 Feb 8;4:6. doi: 10.1186/1742-6413-4-6.
Since the introduction of the liquid-based ThinPrep testing in 1996, most cytology laboratories across the country have adopted the liquid-based cytology (LBC) for Pap test screening. Subsequent to wide-spread adoption of the ThinPrep Pap test, the ThinPrep Imaging System (TIS) Cytyc Corp, Marlborough, MA was introduced to improve the accuracy and efficiency of screening interpretation. We report our initial experience with the TIS at Magee Women's Hospital. We introduced the TIS in December 2004.
The imager assisted Pap test results over the first 12 months (December 2004 to December 2005) of implementation were reviewed and analyzed. Our implementation protocol included each cytotechnologist manually prescreening 200 negative slides to gain experience with the imager slides and serve as a quality check for the TIS. We re-screened 3400 slides (200 slides each for 17 cytotechnologists) manually which were initially determined to be negative using the TIS. 104,457 Pap tests were imaged on the TIS. 95,899 manually screened Pap tests, 12 months prior to the introduction of the TIS (December 2003-November 2004) are taken as the historic control group for our study.
The mean ASC-US rate employing the automated imager was 8.70% [9088/104,457]. The mean LSIL detection rate was 4.22% [4409/104,457]. The imager did not miss any detectable high-grade lesions during these months, with a HSIL (+) detection rate of 0.68% in comparison to 0.60% by manual screening confirmed by follow-up biopsies. The difference is statistically significant with a p value of 0.022. The definition of false negative rate for purposes of this study is calculated as the number of false negative cases identified out of number of negatives re-screened. The TIS false negative rate was estimated at 0.012% [4/3400].
The overall performance of the TIS in our lab appears to be highly satisfactory in terms of improving sensitivity in screening cervical precursor lesions. The increased accuracy of detection of HSIL indicates a positive impact of the TIS in our laboratory.
自1996年引入液基薄层制片检测以来,全国大多数细胞学实验室已采用液基细胞学(LBC)进行巴氏试验筛查。在广泛采用薄层制片巴氏试验之后,马萨诸塞州马尔伯勒的Cytyc公司推出了薄层制片成像系统(TIS),以提高筛查解读的准确性和效率。我们报告在梅杰妇女医院使用TIS的初步经验。我们于2004年12月引入了TIS。
回顾并分析了实施TIS的前12个月(2004年12月至2005年12月)成像辅助巴氏试验的结果。我们的实施方案包括让每位细胞技术人员手动预筛查200张阴性玻片,以积累对成像玻片的经验,并作为TIS的质量检查。我们重新手动筛查了3400张玻片(17位细胞技术人员每人200张),这些玻片最初使用TIS判定为阴性。在TIS上对104,457例巴氏试验进行了成像。在引入TIS前12个月(2003年12月至2004年11月)手动筛查的95,899例巴氏试验作为我们研究的历史对照组。
使用自动成像仪的平均非典型鳞状细胞不能明确意义(ASC-US)率为8.70%[9088/104,457]。平均低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)检出率为4.22%[4409/104,457]。在这几个月中,成像仪未漏诊任何可检测到的高级别病变,高级别鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL)(+)检出率为0.68%,而通过后续活检证实的手动筛查检出率为0.60%。差异具有统计学意义,p值为0.022。本研究中假阴性率的定义计算为重新筛查的阴性病例数中识别出的假阴性病例数。TIS的假阴性率估计为0.012%[4/3400]。
就提高宫颈前驱病变筛查的敏感性而言,TIS在我们实验室的整体表现似乎非常令人满意。HSIL检测准确性的提高表明TIS在我们实验室产生了积极影响。