Devereux Richard B, Dahlöf Björn
Greenberg Division of Cardiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Feb;23(2):443-57. doi: 10.1185/030079906X167435.
The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension (LIFE) study is the first, and, so far, the only endpoint trial in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) to show a divergent therapeutic outcome of one treatment modality over another with equivalent blood pressure control. The purpose of this article is to review post hoc sub-analyses of LIFE study data and other clinical studies that offer some insight into possible treatment-related differences contributing to the superior stroke outcome of losartan versus atenolol beyond blood pressure reduction.
Relevant randomized clinical trials and review articles were identified through a MEDLINE search of English-language articles published between 1990 and 2006 using the search terms losartan, atenolol, LIFE, hypertension, and LVH. Articles describing major clinical studies, new data, or mechanisms pertinent to the LIFE study were selected for review.
Differences in blood pressure or in the distribution of add-on medications were not evident between study groups in the LIFE study. Thus, the observed outcomes benefits favoring losartan may involve other possible mechanisms, including differential effects of losartan and atenolol on LVH regression, left atrial diameter, atrial fibrillation, brain natriuretic peptide, vascular structure, thrombus formation/platelet aggregation, serum uric acid, albuminuria, new-onset diabetes, and lipid metabolism. Alternative explanations for the LIFE study findings have also been put forward, including the choice of atenolol as an appropriate active comparator and differential effects between treatment groups on central pulse pressure. Additional clinical trials are needed to determine if the beneficial effects of losartan seen in LIFE are shared by other inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system.
Sub-analyses of the LIFE study data suggest that losartan's stroke benefit may arise from a mosaic of mechanisms rather than a single action. Further studies are expected to continue to delineate the mechanisms of differential responses to treatments in LIFE.
氯沙坦干预降低高血压终点事件(LIFE)研究是首例,且迄今为止唯一一项针对高血压合并左心室肥厚(LVH)患者的终点试验,该试验显示在血压得到同等控制的情况下,一种治疗方式相对于另一种治疗方式具有不同的治疗结果。本文旨在回顾LIFE研究数据的事后亚组分析以及其他临床研究,这些研究为氯沙坦与阿替洛尔相比在降低血压之外导致更好的卒中结局的可能治疗相关差异提供了一些见解。
通过检索MEDLINE数据库,使用搜索词氯沙坦、阿替洛尔、LIFE、高血压和LVH,确定了1990年至2006年间发表的英文相关随机临床试验和综述文章。选择描述与LIFE研究相关的主要临床研究、新数据或机制的文章进行综述。
LIFE研究中各研究组之间在血压或附加药物分布方面没有明显差异。因此,观察到的有利于氯沙坦的结局益处可能涉及其他可能的机制,包括氯沙坦和阿替洛尔对LVH消退、左心房直径、心房颤动、脑钠肽、血管结构、血栓形成/血小板聚集、血清尿酸、蛋白尿、新发糖尿病和脂质代谢的不同影响。也有人对LIFE研究结果提出了其他解释,包括选择阿替洛尔作为合适的活性对照以及治疗组之间对中心脉压的不同影响。需要更多的临床试验来确定其他肾素 - 血管紧张素系统抑制剂是否也具有LIFE研究中所见的氯沙坦的有益作用。
LIFE研究数据的亚组分析表明,氯沙坦对卒中的益处可能源于多种机制而非单一作用。预计进一步的研究将继续阐明LIFE研究中对治疗的不同反应机制。