Letrilliart Laurent, Gelas-Dore Bénédicte, Ortolan Bernard, Colin Cyrille
Department of Medical Information, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France.
Inform Prim Care. 2006;14(3):157-65. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v14i3.626.
Clinical data are most useful, both at the individual level and collectively, if they are coded according to a standard classification system. However, clinicians often have little motivation to routinely code their consultation data. The main classification systems available in French primary care are the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) and the Dictionary of Consultation Results (DCR).
To assess the feasibility of using the ICPC-2 and the DCR for coding health problems managed in routine general practice in France.
Between December 2001 and June 2003, 61 volunteer general practitioners (GPs) from the Paris area prospectively recorded the health problems they managed at consultations, using either the ICPC (36 GPs) or the DCR (25 GPs), for a period of six months. They were equipped with one of three proprietary medical software applications specifically adapted for the study, or one open source utility, interfacing with five other, non-adapted, proprietary software programs. They had a two-day training session, were financially compensated, and were provided with electronic feedback.
The mean reported coding time per consultation was 2.5 minutes, but 28 physicians (46%) judged the coding time excessive and reported a maximum acceptable time of 1.2 minutes. Coding consultation data was considered more useful at the collective level (by 95% of physicians) than at the individual practice level (by 69%). Only 34 physicians (56%) expressed willingness to carry on routine coding after the end of the study. Some results differed depending on the classification system used, especially due to confounding factors, as some physicians could have previously used the given system.
Coding health problems on a routine basis proved to be feasible. However, this process can be used on a more widespread basis and linked to other management data only if physicians are specially trained and rewarded, and the software incorporates large terminologies mapped with classifications.
临床数据若依据标准分类系统进行编码,无论在个体层面还是总体层面都将最具实用价值。然而,临床医生通常缺乏对其会诊数据进行常规编码的动力。法国初级保健中可用的主要分类系统是国际初级保健分类法(ICPC)和会诊结果词典(DCR)。
评估使用ICPC - 2和DCR对法国常规全科医疗中管理的健康问题进行编码的可行性。
在2001年12月至2003年6月期间,来自巴黎地区的61名志愿全科医生(GP)前瞻性地记录了他们在会诊中管理的健康问题,其中36名GP使用ICPC,25名GP使用DCR,为期六个月。他们配备了专门为该研究改编的三种专有医学软件应用程序之一,或一种开源实用程序,这些程序与其他五个未改编的专有软件程序相连。他们接受了为期两天的培训,获得了经济补偿,并收到了电子反馈。
每次会诊报告的平均编码时间为2.5分钟,但28名医生(46%)认为编码时间过长,并报告最大可接受时间为1.2分钟。医生们认为编码会诊数据在总体层面(95%的医生)比在个体医疗实践层面(69%)更有用。只有34名医生(56%)表示在研究结束后愿意继续进行常规编码。一些结果因所使用的分类系统而异,特别是由于混杂因素,因为一些医生之前可能使用过给定的系统。
事实证明,对健康问题进行常规编码是可行的。然而,只有在医生接受专门培训并得到奖励,且软件纳入与分类映射的大型术语表时,这个过程才能更广泛地应用并与其他管理数据相联系。