Soler Jean-Karl, Okkes Inge, Wood Maurice, Lamberts Henk
Institute of Postgraduate Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT521SA, UK.
Fam Pract. 2008 Aug;25(4):312-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn028. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
The International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) has, since its introduction in 1987, been quite successful. Now in its second revised version, it has been translated in 22 languages, accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a member of the Family of International Classifications, and is being widely used both in routine daily practice and in research. In this contribution, it is explained that ICPC was designed as a theoretical classification, and that it has especially great potential when used (1) supported by the ICPC2/ICD10 Thesaurus, (2) in sufficiently large studies to allow all classes to be observed often enough to provide reliable data, and (3) in studies based on data on episodes of care, rather than encounter data only. Under these conditions, the likelihood ratios of symptoms given a diagnosis, and of co-morbidity become available, which define the clinical content of family practice.
国际初级保健分类法(ICPC)自1987年推出以来,取得了相当大的成功。现在它已是第二版修订本,已被翻译成22种语言,被世界卫生组织(WHO)接纳为国际分类家族的一员,并在日常实践和研究中得到广泛应用。在本论文中,作者解释了ICPC是作为一种理论分类法设计的,并且当它在以下情况下使用时具有特别大的潜力:(1)由ICPC2/ICD10叙词表提供支持;(2)在足够大的研究中,使所有类别都能被充分观察以提供可靠数据;(3)在基于医疗照护事件数据而非仅就诊数据的研究中。在这些条件下,可得出给定诊断的症状似然比以及共病的似然比,它们界定了家庭医疗的临床内容。