Suppr超能文献

呼吸道感染患者每日一次与每日两次抗生素治疗方案的依从性比较:一项随机试验的结果

Comparison of patient compliance with once-daily and twice-daily antibiotic regimens in respiratory tract infections: results of a randomized trial.

作者信息

Kardas Przemyslaw

机构信息

The First Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Narutowicza St 96 Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Mar;59(3):531-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl528. Epub 2007 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient compliance seems to be highly dependent on the number of daily doses. However, it is unclear whether this effect is still present in the case of infrequent regimens during short-term antibiotic treatment. The aim of this study was to find out whether a once-daily antibiotic regimen provides better patient compliance in the case of common respiratory tract infections than a twice-daily regimen.

METHODS

Outpatients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were treated with clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily or clarithromycin in modified release formulation 500 mg once daily, for 7 days in a prospective, randomized, single-centre study. Patient compliance was assessed with electronic monitoring.

RESULTS

Of 122 patients randomized, 119 were evaluable (58 in the once-daily group and 61 in the twice-daily group). All the studied parameters indicated significantly better compliance with the once-daily versus twice-daily antibiotic formulation: overall compliance (93.7% versus 81.3%, P < 0.0001), days with correct number of doses taken (80.3% versus 68.6%, P < 0.0001), correct interdose intervals (74.4% versus 56.4%, P < 0.001), and the mean interdose intervals (95.6% versus 106.3% of the expected values, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study has proved much better patient compliance with a once-daily versus a twice-daily antibiotic regimen. This effect has been marked in both dosing and timing compliance. These findings indicate the clinical usefulness of a once-daily antibiotic regimen in assuring patient compliance during the treatment of respiratory tract infections.

摘要

背景

患者的依从性似乎高度依赖于每日剂量数。然而,在短期抗生素治疗中采用不频繁给药方案时,这种影响是否仍然存在尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定在常见呼吸道感染病例中,每日一次的抗生素给药方案是否比每日两次的给药方案具有更好的患者依从性。

方法

在一项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究中,对慢性支气管炎急性细菌加重的门诊患者,采用每日两次口服250mg克拉霉素或每日一次口服500mg克拉霉素缓释制剂进行治疗,疗程7天。通过电子监测评估患者的依从性。

结果

122例随机分组的患者中,119例可进行评估(每日一次组58例,每日两次组61例)。所有研究参数均表明,与每日两次的抗生素制剂相比,每日一次的制剂依从性显著更好:总体依从性(93.7%对81.3%,P<0.0001)、服用正确剂量天数(80.3%对68.6%,P<0.0001)、正确的给药间隔(74.4%对56.4%,P<0.001)以及平均给药间隔(为预期值的95.6%对106.3%,P<0.001)。

结论

该研究已证明,与每日两次的抗生素给药方案相比,患者对每日一次的给药方案依从性要好得多。这种效果在给药剂量和给药时间的依从性方面均很明显。这些发现表明每日一次的抗生素给药方案在确保呼吸道感染治疗期间患者依从性方面具有临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验