Belke Terry W
Mount Allison University, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada E4L 1C7.
Behav Processes. 2007 May;75(1):72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.12.007. Epub 2007 Jan 13.
Rats were exposed to a fixed interval 30 s schedule that produced opportunities to run of equal or unequal durations to assess the effect of differences in duration on responding. Each duration was signaled by a different stimulus. Wheel-running reinforcer duration pairs were 30 s 30 s, 50 s 10 s, and 55 s 5 s. An analysis of median postreinforcement pause duration and mean local lever-pressing rates broken down by previous reinforcer duration and duration of signaled upcoming reinforcer showed that postreinforcement pause duration was affected by the duration of the previous reinforcer but not by the stimulus signaling the duration of the upcoming reinforcer. Local lever-pressing rates were not affected by either previous or upcoming reinforcer duration. In general, the results are consistent with indifference between these durations obtained using a concurrent choice procedure.
将大鼠置于固定间隔30秒的程序中,该程序产生了持续时间相等或不等的奔跑机会,以评估持续时间差异对反应的影响。每个持续时间由不同的刺激信号表示。转轮奔跑强化物持续时间对为30秒对30秒、50秒对10秒和55秒对5秒。对强化后停顿持续时间中位数和按先前强化物持续时间及即将到来的强化物信号持续时间细分的平均局部杠杆按压率进行分析表明,强化后停顿持续时间受先前强化物持续时间的影响,但不受即将到来的强化物持续时间信号刺激的影响。局部杠杆按压率不受先前或即将到来的强化物持续时间的影响。总体而言,这些结果与使用同时选择程序获得的这些持续时间之间的无差异一致。