• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,右心室梗死所致心源性休克与左心室泵衰竭患者的晚期生存率比较。

Comparison of late survival in patients with cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular infarction versus left ventricular pump failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Brodie Bruce R, Stuckey Thomas D, Hansen Charles, Bradshaw Barbara H, Downey William E, Pulsipher Mark W

机构信息

LeBauer Cardiovascular Research Foundation and Moses Cone Heart and Vascular Center, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 15;99(4):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.091. Epub 2006 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.091
PMID:17293178
Abstract

This study compared late survival after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular (RV) infarction versus left ventricular (LV) pump failure. Consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary PCI (n = 2,496) were prospectively enrolled in a registry from 1984 to 2004. Cardiogenic shock occurred before PCI in 189 patients (7.6%). Shock was attributed to predominant RV infarction when there was right coronary artery occlusion with preserved LV function and increased right atrial pressure. Patients with shock due to RV infarction (n = 30) versus LV pump failure (n = 136) had fewer previous infarctions (10% vs 29%, p = 0.03), less multivessel disease (20% vs 47%, p = 0.007), higher right atrial pressure (21 vs 16 mm, p = 0.003), and better LV ejection fraction (57% vs 32%, p <0.001). In-hospital mortality was lower with shock due to RV infarction (23% vs 50%, p = 0.01), and shock due to RV infarction was a significant independent predictor of late cardiac survival (hazard ratio 0.28, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.62, p = 0.002). In conclusion, survival after primary PCI in patients with shock due to RV infarction is better than that in patients with shock due to LV pump failure. This is in contrast to most previous reports. Improved survival is likely related to lower risk profile and previously documented substantial recovery of RV function after primary PCI.

摘要

本研究比较了因右心室(RV)梗死与左心室(LV)泵衰竭导致的心源性休克患者在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的远期生存率。1984年至2004年期间,连续入选了2496例接受直接PCI治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者,并将其纳入一项登记研究。189例患者(7.6%)在PCI术前发生心源性休克。当右冠状动脉闭塞但左心室功能保留且右心房压力升高时,休克被归因于主要的右心室梗死。因右心室梗死导致休克的患者(n = 30)与因左心室泵衰竭导致休克的患者(n = 136)相比,既往梗死次数较少(10%对29%,p = 0.03),多支血管病变较少(20%对47%,p = 0.007),右心房压力较高(21对16 mmHg,p = 0.003),左心室射血分数较好(57%对32%,p <0.001)。因右心室梗死导致休克的患者住院死亡率较低(23%对50%,p = 0.01),且右心室梗死导致的休克是远期心脏生存的显著独立预测因素(风险比0.28,95%置信区间0.13至0.62,p = 0.002)。总之,因右心室梗死导致休克的患者在接受直接PCI后的生存率高于因左心室泵衰竭导致休克的患者。这与大多数既往报道相反。生存率的提高可能与较低的风险特征以及既往记录的直接PCI后右心室功能的显著恢复有关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of late survival in patients with cardiogenic shock due to right ventricular infarction versus left ventricular pump failure following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction.ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,右心室梗死所致心源性休克与左心室泵衰竭患者的晚期生存率比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 15;99(4):431-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.091. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
2
Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.心源性休克患者在溶栓治疗失败后是否应接受补救性血管成形术:心源性休克患者直接血管成形术与补救性血管成形术的比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 May;19(5):217-23.
3
Mortality after emergent percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock secondary to acute myocardial infarction and usefulness of a mortality prediction model.急性心肌梗死继发心源性休克患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的死亡率及死亡率预测模型的效用
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Jul 1;96(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.02.040.
4
Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.比较急性心肌梗死后并发心原性休克患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前后行主动脉内球囊反搏术的院内死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 1;105(7):967-71. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.021. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
5
Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of non-infarct artery intervention during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry).ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间非梗死动脉介入治疗的患病率、预测因素及院内结局(来自国家心血管数据注册库)
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 15;104(4):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.04.016. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
6
Usefulness of prehospital triage in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.院前分诊在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的合并ST段抬高型心肌梗死的心源性休克患者中的应用价值。
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Sep 1;100(5):787-92. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.03.099. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
7
Primary angioplasty for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.用于治疗并发急性心肌梗死的心源性休克的直接血管成形术。
Indian Heart J. 1999 Jan-Feb;51(1):47-54.
8
Percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock in the SHOCK Trial Registry.SHOCK试验注册研究中的心源性休克经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Am Heart J. 2001 Jun;141(6):964-70. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115294.
9
Relation between electrocardiographic ST-segment resolution and early and late outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后心电图ST段分辨率与早期及晚期预后的关系
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Feb 1;95(3):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.09.031.
10
Impact of the New York State Cardiac Surgery and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Reporting System on the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.纽约州心脏手术及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗报告系统对急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者管理的影响
Am Heart J. 2008 Feb;155(2):267-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.013. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiogenic shock: diagnosis, phenotyping and management.心源性休克:诊断、分型及管理
Intensive Care Med. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-025-08049-y.
2
Contemporary Evidence and Practice on Right Heart Catheterization in Patients with Acute or Chronic Heart Failure.急性或慢性心力衰竭患者右心导管检查的当代证据与实践
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 7;14(2):136. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14020136.
3
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Monitoring in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock: Time for a Reappraisal?心源性休克患者的肺动脉导管监测:是时候重新评估了吗?
Card Fail Rev. 2022 Apr 26;8:e15. doi: 10.15420/cfr.2021.32. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Right Ventricular Infarction According to Modalities of Reperfusion Strategies in China: Data From China Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.中国右心室梗死患者基于再灌注策略方式的短期和长期结局:来自中国急性心肌梗死注册研究的数据
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Feb 10;9:741110. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.741110. eCollection 2022.
5
Multimodality imaging of the ischemic right ventricle: an overview and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm.缺血性右心室的多模态影像学:概述和诊断算法的建议。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Nov;37(11):3343-3354. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02309-w. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
6
Impact of right ventricular diastolic dysfunction on clinical outcomes in inferior STEMI.下壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者右心室舒张功能障碍对临床结局的影响
Herz. 2019 Apr;44(2):155-160. doi: 10.1007/s00059-017-4631-9. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
7
Barthel Index as a Predictor of 1-Year Mortality in Very Elderly Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Better Activities of Daily Living, Longer Life.巴氏指数作为急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高龄患者1年死亡率的预测指标:日常生活活动能力越好,寿命越长。
Clin Cardiol. 2016 Feb;39(2):83-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.22497. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
8
Primary reperfusion in acute right ventricular infarction: An observational study.急性右心室梗死的初次再灌注:一项观察性研究。
World J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 26;6(1):14-22. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i1.14.
9
Increased Expression of ATP-sensitive K Channels Improves the Right Ventricular Tolerance to Hypoxia in Rabbit Hearts.ATP 敏感性钾通道表达增加可改善兔心右心室对缺氧的耐受能力。
Korean J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;15(4):189-94. doi: 10.4196/kjpp.2011.15.4.189. Epub 2011 Aug 31.