Suppr超能文献

近期临床实践中美国商业保险患者停用降脂药物的情况。

Discontinuation of lipid modifying drugs among commercially insured United States patients in recent clinical practice.

作者信息

Kamal-Bahl Sachin J, Burke Thomas, Watson Douglas, Wentworth Chuck

机构信息

Outcomes Research & Management, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Feb 15;99(4):530-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.063. Epub 2006 Dec 28.

Abstract

Although several lipid-modifying drug (LMD) treatments and strategies are available to successfully manage patients at risk for cardiovascular events, the benefits of drug treatment can be realized only if these therapies are continued on a long-term basis. Previous observational studies examining rates of discontinuation with LMDs are not generalizable to current clinical practice in the United States. In this study, the discontinuation of newly initiated LMD classes in recent clinical practice was compared in a geographically diverse, commercially insured United States population. Administrative claims from the Ingenix Lab/Rx Database were used to identify patients aged >or=20 years who were newly prescribed statins, extended-release niacin, fibrates, bile acid sequestrants, or ezetimibe from January 1, 2001, to June 30, 2003. An LMD class was considered discontinued if a patient did not receive a prescription from the same LMD class within 180 days of the most recent prescription expiration date. The median time to discontinuation was 8.2 months in the bile acid sequestrant group, followed by 12 months in the extended-release niacin group, 17.4 months in the fibrate group, and 27.5 months in the statin group. By the end of 1 year, the adjusted cumulative incidence of discontinuation was 68.3% in bile acid sequestrant users, 55.4% in extended-release niacin users, 39.9% in fibrate users, 33.0% in ezetimibe users, and 28.9% in statin users (p <0.001 for all LMD classes vs statins). In conclusion, despite the changes in lipid treatment paradigms and the importance of long-term lipid therapy, this study found high discontinuation rates of LMD classes in recent United States clinical practice.

摘要

虽然有几种调脂药物(LMD)治疗方法和策略可用于成功管理有心血管事件风险的患者,但只有长期持续使用这些疗法才能实现药物治疗的益处。先前关于LMD停药率的观察性研究不能推广到美国目前的临床实践。在本研究中,对美国一个地域多样、有商业保险的人群中近期临床实践中新开始使用的LMD类别停药情况进行了比较。利用英格尼斯实验室/处方数据库的管理性索赔数据,识别出2001年1月1日至2003年6月30日期间新开具他汀类药物、缓释烟酸、贝特类药物、胆汁酸螯合剂或依泽替米贝处方的年龄≥20岁的患者。如果患者在最近一次处方到期日期后的180天内未收到同一LMD类别的处方,则认为该LMD类别停药。胆汁酸螯合剂组停药的中位时间为8.2个月,其次是缓释烟酸组12个月、贝特类药物组17.4个月、他汀类药物组27.5个月。到1年末,胆汁酸螯合剂使用者停药的校正累积发生率为68.3%,缓释烟酸使用者为55.4%,贝特类药物使用者为39.9%,依泽替米贝使用者为33.0%,他汀类药物使用者为28.9%(所有LMD类别与他汀类药物相比,p<0.001)。总之,尽管脂质治疗模式有所变化且长期脂质治疗很重要,但本研究发现美国近期临床实践中LMD类别的停药率很高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验