Velis Demetrios, Plouin Perrine, Gotman Jean, da Silva Fernando Lopes
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, Dutch Epilepsy Clinics Foundation, Heemstede, The Netherlands.
Epilepsia. 2007 Feb;48(2):379-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2007.00920.x.
The purpose of this paper is to update the state of knowledge with respect to long-term monitoring (LTM) in epilepsy and to formulate recommendations regarding the application of LTM in clinical practice. LTM is an established technique in use both in a hospital setting and, increasingly, in an ambulatory and more recently in a community-based setting. There has been sufficient evidence to substantiate the claim that LTM is of crucial importance in documenting electroclinical correlations both in epilepsy and in paroxysmally occurring behavioral changes often mistaken for epilepsy. Internationally recognized neurophysiological equipment standards, data acquisition and data transfer protocols and widely accepted safety standards have made widespread access to LTM facilities in epilepsy possible. Recommendations on efficient and effective use of resources as well as regarding training and competencies for personnel involved in LTM in epilepsy have been formulated. The DMC Neurophysiology Subcommittee of the ILAE recommends use of hospital-based LTM in the documentation of seizures including its application for assessing seizure type and frequency, in the evaluation of status epilepticus, in noninvasive and invasive video/EEG investigations for epilepsy surgery and for the differential diagnosis between epilepsy and paroxysmally occurring nonepileptic conditions, in children and in adults. Ambulatory outpatient and community-based LTM may be used as a substitute for inpatient LTM in cases where the latter is not cost-effective or feasible or when activation procedures aimed at increasing seizure yield are not indicated. However, outpatient ambulatory monitoring may be less informative than is inpatient monitoring in some cases because: (1) reduction of medication to provoke seizures may not be safe as an outpatient; (2) faulty electrode contacts cannot quickly be noticed and repaired; (3) the patient may move out of video surveillance; and (4) duration of ambulatory monitoring can be limited by technical constraints.
本文旨在更新癫痫长期监测(LTM)的知识现状,并就LTM在临床实践中的应用提出建议。LTM是一种既定技术,已在医院环境中使用,并且越来越多地用于门诊,最近也用于社区环境。有充分证据证实,LTM在记录癫痫以及常被误诊为癫痫的发作性行为变化中的电临床相关性方面至关重要。国际认可的神经生理设备标准、数据采集和数据传输协议以及广泛接受的安全标准使得癫痫患者能够广泛使用LTM设备。已经制定了关于有效利用资源以及癫痫LTM相关人员培训和能力的建议。国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)的药物和治疗方法委员会(DMC)神经生理学小组委员会建议在癫痫发作的记录中使用基于医院的LTM,包括用于评估癫痫发作类型和频率、癫痫持续状态的评估、癫痫手术的非侵入性和侵入性视频/脑电图检查以及癫痫与发作性非癫痫疾病的鉴别诊断,适用于儿童和成人。在住院LTM不具有成本效益或不可行,或者不适合采用旨在提高癫痫发作率的激活程序的情况下,可以使用门诊和社区LTM替代住院LTM。然而,在某些情况下,门诊动态监测可能不如住院监测提供的信息丰富,原因如下:(1)作为门诊患者,减少药物以诱发癫痫发作可能不安全;(2)电极接触不良无法迅速被发现和修复;(3)患者可能移出视频监控范围;(4)动态监测的持续时间可能受到技术限制。