• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Study Reviewing Timing to Onset of Habitual Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures in a Home Video Telemetry Cohort.一项回顾性研究:回顾家庭视频遥测队列中习惯性心因性非癫痫性发作的发病时间
Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 26;14(12):1187. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121187.
2
[Phenomenology and psychiatric origins of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures].[心因性非癫痫性发作的现象学与精神科起源]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2004 Jan-Feb;132(1-2):22-7. doi: 10.2298/sarh0402022r.
3
Structural Changes in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Associated With Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.与精神性非癫痫性发作相关的脑磁共振成像结构变化:一项分析性横断面研究。
Cureus. 2022 Dec 2;14(12):e32144. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32144. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Ictal crying in epileptic seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: What are the hints to differentiate them?癫痫发作和非癫痫性发作性哭泣:有哪些提示可以区分它们?
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Oct;147:109385. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109385. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
5
Distinguishing psychogenic nonepileptic, mixed, and epileptic seizures using systemic measures and reported experiences.使用系统措施和报告的经历来区分心因性非癫痫性发作、混合性发作和癫痫性发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Mar;116:107684. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107684. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
6
Utilization of brain imaging in evaluating patients with psychogenic nonepileptic spells.脑成像在评估精神性非癫痫性发作患者中的应用。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Aug;85:177-182. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.015. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
7
The coexistence of psychogenic nonepileptic and epileptic seizures in the same patient is more frequent than expected: Is there any clinical feature for defining these patients?同一患者中精神性非癫痫性发作和癫痫性发作共存的情况比预期更为常见:是否存在用于定义这些患者的任何临床特征?
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Apr;105:106940. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.106940. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
8
Association between kinetic semiology of psychogenic nonepileptic spells and seizure type in dual disorder.双相障碍患者心因性非癫痫性发作的运动半征与发作类型的关系。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt A):107597. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107597. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
9
Pediatric psychogenic non-epileptic seizures: A retrospective observational cohort study at a quaternary center.小儿心因性非癫痫性发作:一项在四级医疗中心进行的回顾性观察队列研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Sep;146:109359. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109359. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
10
Diagnostic Yield of 8-Hour Video-EEG in Detecting Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures (PNES).8小时视频脑电图检测精神性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的诊断率
Neurodiagn J. 2021 Dec;61(4):186-195. doi: 10.1080/21646821.2021.2001246. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Cooper et al. A Retrospective Study Reviewing Timing to Onset of Habitual Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures in a Home Video Telemetry Cohort. 2024, , 1187.更正:库珀等人。一项回顾性研究,回顾家庭视频遥测队列中习惯性心因性非癫痫性发作的发病时间。2024年,,1187。 (注:原文中“2024,,”表述似乎有误,不太明确准确意思)
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 12;15(1):64. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010064.

本文引用的文献

1
The unforeseen future: Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on home video-EEG telemetry.意料之外的未来:COVID-19 大流行对家庭视频-EEG 遥测的影响。
Epilepsia. 2023 Dec;64 Suppl 4:S12-S22. doi: 10.1111/epi.17473. Epub 2022 Dec 18.
2
ILAE definition of the Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy Syndromes: Position statement by the ILAE Task Force on Nosology and Definitions.ILAE 特发性全面性癫痫综合征定义:ILAE 分类和定义委员会专题工作组的立场声明。
Epilepsia. 2022 Jun;63(6):1475-1499. doi: 10.1111/epi.17236. Epub 2022 May 3.
3
Mortality in patients with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures a population-based cohort study.精神性非癫痫性发作患者的死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;93(4):379-385. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328035. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
4
Predictive semiology of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures in an epilepsy monitoring unit.癫痫监测单元中心理性非癲痫性发作的预测性半征。
J Neurol. 2022 Apr;269(4):2172-2178. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10805-1. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Incidence and prevalence of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in a Norwegian county: A 10-year population-based study.挪威某郡心因性非癫痫性发作的发病率和患病率:一项基于人群的10年研究。
Epilepsia. 2021 Jul;62(7):1528-1535. doi: 10.1111/epi.16949. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.精神心因性非癫痫性发作患者的精神共病。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107918. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107918. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
Latency to First Event is Shorter in Psychogenic Non-epileptic Seizures than in Epileptic Seizures in an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit.在癫痫监测单元中,心因性非癫痫性发作的首次发作潜伏期比癫痫性发作的更短。
Innov Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jul 1;17(7-9):26-29.
8
How to distinguish seizures from non-epileptic manifestations.如何区分癫痫发作与非癫痫发作。
Epileptic Disord. 2020 Dec 1;22(6):716-738. doi: 10.1684/epd.2020.1234.
9
Can seizure-related heart rate differentiate epileptic from psychogenic nonepileptic seizures?与癫痫发作相关的心率能否区分癫痫性发作和精神性非癫痫性发作?
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Nov;112:107353. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107353. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
Evidence-Based Practice for the Clinical Assessment of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures: A Report From the American Neuropsychiatric Association Committee on Research.基于证据的精神性非癲痫性发作临床评估实践:美国神经精神科协会研究委员会报告。
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Winter;33(1):27-42. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19120354. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

一项回顾性研究:回顾家庭视频遥测队列中习惯性心因性非癫痫性发作的发病时间

A Retrospective Study Reviewing Timing to Onset of Habitual Psychogenic Non-Epileptic Seizures in a Home Video Telemetry Cohort.

作者信息

Cooper Jade, Chester Helen, Fozzato Arianna, Sokolov Elisaveta

机构信息

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK.

School of Optometry, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7UP, UK.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Nov 26;14(12):1187. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121187.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci14121187
PMID:39766386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11674186/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the onset time to habitual psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) in adults referred to Guy's and St Thomas' Neurophysiology Department for home video telemetry (HVT) with a clinical question of PNES. The primary objective was to determine the optimal time window for HVT recording for patients with suspected PNES to try to improve the allocation of clinical resources. The secondary objective was to explore any potential association between time to habitual PN ES onset and demographic indexes and other clinical, neuro-radiological and semiological findings.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of our XLTEK database between 2019 and 2020. A multifactorial analysis of PNES semiologic subtypes, patient demographics, psychiatric comorbidities and neuroimaging was conducted to explore their impact on time to PNES within an HVT study. People who had at least one typical PNES during their recording were included. The exclusion criteria included people who had the test performed without video recording. The total number of participants was 37. The data were extracted from our local XLTEK database. Statistical analyses using Mann-Whitney U and Fischer exact tests were carried out.

RESULTS

The mean time to first habitual PNES onset was seven hours, with a mean recording duration of 46 h. The most commonly occurring event type was blank spells (12, 32%), with the least common presentation being déjà vu (1, 3%). There was a significant association between time to PNES onset and male sex ( = 0.04). There was a significant association between time to PNES onset and abnormal MRI findings ( = 0.02). Particular PNES semiologic subtypes were not significantly linked with PNES onset time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights that on average, patients with PNES will rapidly have their first habitual event within an HVT study (mean time to event onset of seven hours), consistent with the current literature. This raises the question of whether HVT study duration could be reduced to release study resources and aid departmental efficiencies. We also observe the novel finding that men presented significantly earlier with their habitual PNES event than women, and that abnormal imaging findings were also significantly associated with an earlier time to event onset, although the reason for this association is yet to be determined.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查转诊至盖伊和圣托马斯神经生理学部门进行家庭视频遥测(HVT)且临床问题为精神源性非癫痫性发作(PNES)的成人患者出现习惯性PNES的发作时间。主要目的是确定疑似PNES患者进行HVT记录的最佳时间窗口,以试图改善临床资源的分配。次要目的是探讨习惯性PNES发作时间与人口统计学指标以及其他临床、神经放射学和症状学发现之间的任何潜在关联。

方法

我们对2019年至2020年期间的XLTEK数据库进行了回顾性分析。对PNES症状学亚型、患者人口统计学、精神疾病共病情况和神经影像学进行多因素分析,以探讨它们在HVT研究中对PNES发作时间的影响。纳入在记录期间至少有一次典型PNES发作的患者。排除标准包括未进行视频记录就进行检查的患者。参与者总数为37人。数据从我们当地的XLTEK数据库中提取。使用曼-惠特尼U检验和费舍尔精确检验进行统计分析。

结果

首次习惯性PNES发作的平均时间为7小时,平均记录时长为46小时。最常出现的事件类型是空白发作(12例,32%),最不常见的表现是似曾相识感(1例,3%)。PNES发作时间与男性性别之间存在显著关联(P = 0.04)。PNES发作时间与MRI异常结果之间存在显著关联(P = 0.02)。特定的PNES症状学亚型与PNES发作时间无显著关联。

结论

我们的研究强调,平均而言,PNES患者在HVT研究中会很快出现首次习惯性发作(事件发作的平均时间为7小时),这与当前文献一致。这就提出了一个问题,即HVT研究时长是否可以缩短以释放研究资源并提高科室效率。我们还观察到一个新发现,即男性出现习惯性PNES事件的时间明显早于女性,并且影像学异常结果也与事件发作时间较早显著相关,尽管这种关联的原因尚待确定。