Voracek Martin, Fisher Maryanne L, Hofhansl Angelika, Rekkas P Vivien, Ritthammer Nina
Department of Basic Psychological Research, University of Vienna, Austria.
Psicothema. 2006 Aug;18(3):384-91.
The classic experiments by Clark and Hatfield on sex differences in compliance to offers of dates, apartment visits, and casual sex, and the related informal project of Molzer served as the foundation for the present study. However, whereas individuals in these previous investigations directly approached opposite-sex participants, our research employed surveys to gauge compliance. A sample of 195 male and 179 female Austrian adults were provided with written forms of the Clark and Hatfield scenarios and asked to predict the rates of compliance on a thermometer scale ranging from 0% to 100%. Results indicated that compliance estimates are largely effected by the sex of the receiver to these offers, and to a lesser degree, participants' age and relationship status. The sex of the participant did not significantly effect the results. Relative to the previous work, the compliance rate of males was overestimated, while that of females was underestimated. We offer explanations for the differences in findings between the original investigations and our research, discuss the importance of contextual factors as well as the generality of the Clark-Hatfield findings, especially with respect to females' near-zero receptivity to explicit sexual offers, and point out the relevance of the current findings for health psychology.
克拉克和哈特菲尔德关于接受约会、登门拜访及随意性行为邀约方面性别差异的经典实验,以及莫尔泽相关的非正式项目,构成了本研究的基础。然而,在之前的这些调查中,个体是直接接触异性参与者,而我们的研究采用问卷调查来衡量接受率。向195名奥地利成年男性和179名成年女性提供了克拉克和哈特菲尔德情景的书面形式,并要求他们在0%至100%的温度计量表上预测接受率。结果表明,接受率估计在很大程度上受接受这些邀约者的性别影响,在较小程度上受参与者的年龄和恋爱状况影响。参与者的性别对结果没有显著影响。相对于之前的研究,男性的接受率被高估,而女性的接受率被低估。我们对原始调查与我们的研究结果差异给出了解释,讨论了背景因素的重要性以及克拉克 - 哈特菲尔德研究结果的普遍性,特别是关于女性对露骨性邀约几乎为零的接受度,并指出了当前研究结果对健康心理学的相关性。