Suppr超能文献

药物洗脱支架随机临床试验中的支架内血栓形成

Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents.

作者信息

Mauri Laura, Hsieh Wen-hua, Massaro Joseph M, Ho Kalon K L, D'Agostino Ralph, Cutlip Donald E

机构信息

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 8;356(10):1020-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067731. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Definitions of stent thrombosis that have been used in clinical trials of drug-eluting stents have been restrictive and have not been used in a uniform manner.

METHODS

We applied a hierarchical classification of stent thrombosis set by the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) across randomized trials involving 878 patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents, 1400 treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents, and 2267 treated with bare-metal stents. We then pooled 4 years of follow-up data. All events were adjudicated by an independent clinical-events committee.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of stent thrombosis according to the original protocol definitions was 1.2% in the sirolimus-stent group versus 0.6% in the bare-metal-stent group (P=0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.4 to 1.5) and 1.3% in the paclitaxel-stent group versus 0.8% in the bare-metal-stent group (P=0.24; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.4). The incidence of definite or probable stent thrombosis as defined by the ARC was 1.5% in the sirolimus-stent group versus 1.7% in the bare-metal-stent group (P=0.70; 95% CI, -1.5 to 1.0) and 1.8% in the paclitaxel-stent group versus 1.4% in the bare-metal-stent group (P=0.52; 95% CI, -0.7 to 1.4). The incidence of definite or probable events occurring 1 to 4 years after implantation was 0.9% in the sirolimus-stent group versus 0.4% in the bare-metal-stent group and 0.9% in the paclitaxel-stent group versus 0.6% in the bare-metal-stent group.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of stent thrombosis did not differ significantly between patients with drug-eluting stents and those with bare-metal stents in randomized clinical trials, although the power to detect small differences in rates was limited.

摘要

背景

药物洗脱支架临床试验中使用的支架血栓形成定义较为严格,且使用方式并不统一。

方法

我们将学术研究联盟(ARC)设定的支架血栓形成分层分类应用于随机试验,这些试验涉及878例接受西罗莫司洗脱支架治疗的患者、1400例接受紫杉醇洗脱支架治疗的患者以及2267例接受裸金属支架治疗的患者。然后我们汇总了4年的随访数据。所有事件均由独立的临床事件委员会判定。

结果

根据原始方案定义,西罗莫司洗脱支架组的支架血栓形成累积发生率为1.2%,而裸金属支架组为0.6%(P = 0.20;95%置信区间[CI],-0.4至1.5);紫杉醇洗脱支架组为1.3%,裸金属支架组为0.8%(P = 0.24;95%CI,-0.3至1.4)。根据ARC定义的明确或可能的支架血栓形成发生率,西罗莫司洗脱支架组为1.5%,裸金属支架组为1.7%(P = 0.70;95%CI,-1.5至1.0);紫杉醇洗脱支架组为1.8%,裸金属支架组为1.4%(P = 0.52;95%CI,-0.7至1.4)。植入后1至4年发生明确或可能事件的发生率,西罗莫司洗脱支架组为0.9%,裸金属支架组为0.4%;紫杉醇洗脱支架组为0.9%,裸金属支架组为0.6%。

结论

在随机临床试验中,药物洗脱支架患者与裸金属支架患者的支架血栓形成发生率无显著差异,尽管检测发生率微小差异的能力有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验