Alcalai Ronny, Planer David, Culhaoglu Afsin, Osman Aydin, Pollak Arthur, Lotan Chaim
Heart Institute, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):276-81. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.276.
Although troponin is considered a specific marker for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), recent studies have shown troponin elevation in a variety of nonischemic conditions. Our aim was to determine the predictors for the diagnosis of ACS in the presence of an abnormal troponin level.
All patients with abnormal troponin T levels were analyzed. Demographic and clinical data were collected and death was recorded. The study group was divided into 2 subgroups: ACS vs nonthrombotic troponin elevation. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to define variables that predict the diagnosis of ACS. The positive predictive value (PPV) for ACS diagnosis was calculated, and a survival analysis was performed.
During the study period, 615 patients had elevated troponin T levels. Only 326 patients (53%) received a main diagnosis of ACS, while 254 (41%) had nonthrombotic troponin elevation; for 35 patients (6%), the diagnosis was not conclusive. Positive predictors for the diagnosis of ACS were age between 40 and 70 years, history of hypertension or ischemic heart disease, normal renal function, and a troponin T level higher than 1.0 ng/mL. The overall PPV of troponin T for ACS diagnosis was only 56% (95% CI, 52%-60%). The PPV of troponin T level higher than 1.0 ng/mL in the presence of normal renal function was 90% but was as low as 27% for values of 0.1 to 1.0 ng/mL for elderly patients with renal failure. In-hospital and long-term survival rates were significantly better (P<.001) for patients with ACS.
Nonspecific troponin elevation is a common finding among hospitalized patients and correlates with worse prognosis. The diagnosis of myocardial infarction should still mostly be based on the clinical presentation. The predictors and algorithm suggested in this study might increase the diagnostic accuracy of ACS and direct the appropriate treatment.
尽管肌钙蛋白被认为是诊断急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的特异性标志物,但近期研究显示在多种非缺血性情况下肌钙蛋白也会升高。我们的目的是确定在肌钙蛋白水平异常时诊断ACS的预测因素。
对所有肌钙蛋白T水平异常的患者进行分析。收集人口统计学和临床数据并记录死亡情况。研究组分为两个亚组:ACS组与非血栓性肌钙蛋白升高组。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定预测ACS诊断的变量。计算ACS诊断的阳性预测值(PPV)并进行生存分析。
在研究期间,615例患者肌钙蛋白T水平升高。仅326例患者(53%)被主要诊断为ACS,而254例(41%)有非血栓性肌钙蛋白升高;35例患者(6%)诊断不明确。ACS诊断的阳性预测因素为年龄在40至70岁之间、有高血压或缺血性心脏病史、肾功能正常以及肌钙蛋白T水平高于1.0 ng/mL。肌钙蛋白T对ACS诊断的总体PPV仅为56%(95%CI,52%-60%)。在肾功能正常的情况下,肌钙蛋白T水平高于1.0 ng/mL时PPV为90%,但对于老年肾功能衰竭患者,当肌钙蛋白T值在0.1至1.0 ng/mL时PPV低至27%。ACS患者的院内和长期生存率明显更好(P<0.001)。
非特异性肌钙蛋白升高在住院患者中很常见,且与较差的预后相关。心肌梗死的诊断仍应主要基于临床表现。本研究中提出的预测因素和算法可能会提高ACS的诊断准确性并指导适当的治疗。