Metcalf C A, Yach D
Centre for Epidemiological Research, South African Medical Research Council, Parowvallei.
S Afr Med J. 1992 Jan 4;81(1):23-6.
A postal survey of workplace smoking restrictions among the member organisations of the Cape Chamber of Industries was carried out in 1989. The response rate was 57.1%. Of the 572 respondent organisations, 66.1% had some smoking restrictions. Large workplaces were more likely to restrict smoking than small workplaces: 42.0% of those with fewer than 10 employees had restrictions, increasing to 90.9% of those with more than 500 employees. Organisations producing manufactured goods (other than engineering) were more likely to have restrictions than non-manufacturing concerns. Smoking was commonly restricted on the factory floor (61.3%) and in warehouses (55.8%), but only 7.4% prohibited smoking in shared offices. The reasons for smoking restrictions stated most frequently were the fire hazard (85.3%) and legislation (66.0%). Only 29.1% stated that health care concerns were an important reason for restrictions, while a further 16.3% stated that health was a minor reason for restrictions. Of the respondents, 48.4% expressed a need for guidance in improving their smoking policies. These results indicate that there is considerable potential for intervention to decrease both active and passive smoking in local workplace settings.
1989年,对开普敦工业商会成员组织的工作场所吸烟限制情况进行了一次邮政调查。回复率为57.1%。在572个回复组织中,66.1%有一些吸烟限制。大型工作场所比小型工作场所更有可能限制吸烟:员工少于10人的组织中,42.0%有限制措施,而员工超过500人的组织中这一比例增至90.9%。生产制成品(工程类除外)的组织比非制造业企业更有可能有限制措施。工厂车间(61.3%)和仓库(55.8%)普遍限制吸烟,但只有7.4%在共用办公室禁止吸烟。最常提及的吸烟限制原因是火灾隐患(85.3%)和法规(66.0%)。只有29.1%表示医疗保健方面的担忧是限制的重要原因,另有16.3%表示健康是限制的次要原因。在受访者中,48.4%表示需要在改进吸烟政策方面得到指导。这些结果表明,在当地工作场所环境中,采取干预措施以减少主动和被动吸烟有很大潜力。