Razavi M, Sayre J W, Taira R K, Simons M, Huang H K, Chuang K S, Rahbar G, Kangarloo H
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90024-1721.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Feb;158(2):443-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.158.2.1729805.
Two methods are commonly used to visualize digital radiologic imaging data: (1) hard-copy viewing, in which the digital data are used to modulate the intensity of a laser beam that exposes an analog film and (2) soft-copy viewing, in which the digital data are converted to an analog video signal and presented on a CRT monitor. The film method allows new digital imaging systems to be easily integrated into conventional radiologic management and viewing methods. The second method, soft-copy viewing, allows digital imaging data to be managed and viewed electronically in a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). These PACS systems are hypothesized to have improved operational efficiency and enhanced image-analysis capabilities. The quality of soft-copy images is still not widely accepted. This article reports on the results of a large-scale receiver-operating-characteristic study comparing observers' performance in detecting various pediatric chest abnormalities on soft-copy 2048 x 2048K byte displays with their performance with digital laser-printed film from computed radiography. The disease categories studied were pneumothorax, linear atelectasis, air bronchogram, and interstitial disease. The selected data set included 239 images; 77 contained no proved abnormality and 162 contained one or more of the abnormalities mentioned. Seven pediatric radiologists participated in the study, two as judges and five as observers. Our results show no significant difference between viewing images on digital hard copy and soft copy for the detection of pneumothoraces and air bronchograms. A slight performance edge for soft copy was seen for interstitial disease and linear atelectasis. This result indicates that computed chest radiographs in children viewed in a soft-copy PACS environment should result in diagnoses similar to or slightly more accurate than those obtained in a laser-printed film-based environment.
(1)硬拷贝查看,即数字数据用于调制曝光模拟胶片的激光束强度;(2)软拷贝查看,即数字数据被转换为模拟视频信号并显示在阴极射线管显示器上。胶片方法使新的数字成像系统能够轻松集成到传统的放射管理和查看方法中。第二种方法,即软拷贝查看,允许在图像存档和通信系统(PACS)中对数字成像数据进行电子管理和查看。据推测,这些PACS系统具有更高的运营效率和更强的图像分析能力。软拷贝图像的质量尚未得到广泛认可。本文报告了一项大规模的接收器操作特性研究的结果,该研究比较了观察者在2048×2048K字节软拷贝显示器上检测各种小儿胸部异常的表现与他们在计算机放射成像的数字激光打印胶片上的表现。所研究的疾病类别包括气胸、线状肺不张、空气支气管征和间质性疾病。所选数据集包括239幅图像;77幅未证实有异常,162幅包含一种或多种上述异常。七名儿科放射科医生参与了该研究,两名作为评判员,五名作为观察者。我们的结果表明,在检测气胸和空气支气管征方面,数字硬拷贝和软拷贝图像的查看没有显著差异。对于间质性疾病和线状肺不张,软拷贝有轻微的性能优势。这一结果表明,在软拷贝PACS环境中查看的儿童胸部计算机放射图像应能得出与基于激光打印胶片的环境中相似或略更准确的诊断。