Suppr超能文献

哮喘评分:预测能力与风险因素。

Asthma score: predictive ability and risk factors.

作者信息

Sunyer J, Pekkanen J, Garcia-Esteban R, Svanes C, Künzli N, Janson C, de Marco R, Antó J M, Burney P

机构信息

Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Allergy. 2007 Feb;62(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01184.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Definition of asthma as a continuous score is a promising tool for population studies that has not yet been fully evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed (i) the predictive ability of an asthma score against the occurrence of different asthma-related outcomes and (ii) the risk factors identified when using an asthma score.

METHODS

The European Community Respiratory Health Study II included subjects from the general population randomly studied during 1991-1993 who were followed up in the years 1998-2001, from 29 centres in 14 countries. A total of 8956 subjects were included. The asthma score consisted of a simple sum of the positive answers to five respiratory symptoms.

RESULTS

Asthma score at baseline showed a linear relationship with incidence of asthma, the occurrence of asthma attacks, use of asthma medication and bronchial reactivity at the end of the follow-up. Asthma score at the end of follow-up was associated with known risk factors at baseline such as IgE to grass, rhinitis or body mass index, in addition to passive smoking in men [average score ratio (RR) = 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.50] or changes in body mass index (RR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.05-1.27, per each kg/m(2)).

CONCLUSION

The asthma score had good predictive ability against outcomes related with asthma and also good ability to detect risk factors. This encourages the use of the score as a measure of asthma in epidemiological studies on aetiology of asthma.

摘要

背景

将哮喘定义为连续评分是一种有前景的工具,可用于尚未得到充分评估的人群研究。

目的

我们评估了(i)哮喘评分对不同哮喘相关结局发生情况的预测能力,以及(ii)使用哮喘评分时所确定的风险因素。

方法

欧洲共同体呼吸健康研究II纳入了1991 - 1993年期间从普通人群中随机选取的受试者,并于1998 - 2001年在14个国家的29个中心对其进行随访。共纳入8956名受试者。哮喘评分由对五种呼吸道症状的阳性回答简单相加组成。

结果

基线时的哮喘评分与随访结束时哮喘的发病率、哮喘发作的发生情况、哮喘药物的使用以及支气管反应性呈线性关系。随访结束时的哮喘评分与基线时已知的风险因素相关,如对草的IgE、鼻炎或体重指数,此外男性的被动吸烟情况(平均评分比(RR)= 1.30;95%置信区间(CI)1.09 - 1.50)或体重指数的变化(RR = 1.27;95% CI 1.05 - 1.27,每增加1 kg/m²)。

结论

哮喘评分对与哮喘相关的结局具有良好的预测能力,并且在检测风险因素方面也具有良好能力。这鼓励在哮喘病因学的流行病学研究中使用该评分作为哮喘的一种衡量指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验