Shirley Jamie L
Department of Family and Child Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2007 Jan-Mar;30(1):14-25. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200701000-00003.
This article critiques the dominance of the discourse of autonomy in nursing ethical conversations, and the ways in which it is linked with nursing's commitment to patient advocacy. In its current discursive form, autonomy is too often used to reinforce the position of those already privileged and exacerbates the challenges faced by those with social vulnerabilities. Nursing's historical identity provides both challenges and resources for developing alternate ethical values. We have allowed narrow understandings of autonomy and advocacy to dominate our ethical discourse and have relied too exclusively on them to resolve conflicts and guide practice.
本文批判了护理伦理对话中自主性话语的主导地位,以及它与护理对患者权益倡导承诺的联系。以其当前的话语形式,自主性常常被用来强化那些已经享有特权者的地位,并加剧了社会弱势群体所面临的挑战。护理的历史身份为发展替代伦理价值观既带来了挑战,也提供了资源。我们让对自主性和权益倡导的狭隘理解主导了我们的伦理话语,并且过于排他地依赖它们来解决冲突和指导实践。