Høye Sevald, Severinsson Elisabeth
Faculty of Nursing, Hedmark University College, Elverum, Norway.
Nurs Health Sci. 2007 Mar;9(1):61-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2007.00300.x.
Rigor has important ramifications for the entire qualitative research process. The aim of this study was to evaluate aspects of methodological congruence by focusing on four dimensions of rigor in qualitative nursing research related to the presence of patients' family members in the intensive care unit. Eight research papers covering the years 1990-2004 were analyzed by means of one of Burns and Grove's standards, methodological congruence, for critique and consistency. The results show that there are varying degrees of focus on procedural rigor, such as limitations and bias. Ethical rigor is described clearly in some papers, while others lack descriptions of confidentiality and the voluntary nature of participation. However, all papers contain descriptions of qualitative data analysis. In conclusion, there were strengths in procedural rigor and auditability, but also some limitations in the identification of theoretical development and the scientific tradition on which the article is based.
严谨性对整个定性研究过程有着重要影响。本研究的目的是通过关注定性护理研究中与重症监护病房患者家属在场情况相关的严谨性的四个维度,来评估方法一致性的各个方面。采用伯恩斯和格罗夫的标准之一——方法一致性,对1990年至2004年期间的八篇研究论文进行分析,以进行批判性评估和一致性检验。结果表明,对程序严谨性(如局限性和偏差)的关注程度各不相同。一些论文清晰地描述了伦理严谨性,而另一些论文则缺乏对保密性和参与的自愿性质的描述。然而,所有论文都包含了定性数据分析的描述。总之,在程序严谨性和可审计性方面存在优势,但在理论发展的识别以及文章所基于的科学传统方面也存在一些局限性。