Suppr超能文献

比较基于FEC的定制疗法与骨髓支持的高剂量疗法的SBG 9401研究的长期随访

Long-term follow-up of the SBG 9401 study comparing tailored FEC-based therapy versus marrow-supported high-dose therapy.

作者信息

Wilking N, Lidbrink E, Wiklund T, Erikstein B, Lindman H, Malmström P, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Bengtsson N-O, Söderlund G, Anker G, Wist E, Ottosson S, Salminen E, Ljungman P, Holte H, Nilsson J, Blomqvist C, Bergh J

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2007 Apr;18(4):694-700. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdl488. Epub 2007 Feb 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose was to investigate adjuvant marrow-supportive high-dose chemotherapy compared with an equitoxicity-tailored comparator arm.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five hundred and twenty-five women below the age of 60 years with operated high-risk primary breast cancer were randomised to nine cycles of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supported and individually tailored FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide), (n = 251) or standard FEC followed by marrow-supported high-dose therapy with CTCb (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin) therapy (n = 274), followed by locoregional radiotherapy and tamoxifen for 5 years.

RESULTS

There were 104 breast cancer relapses in the tailored FEC group versus 139 in the CTCb group (double triangular method by Whitehead, P = 0.046), with a median follow-up of all included patients of 60.8 months. The event-free survival demonstrated 121 and 150 events in the tailored FEC- and CTCb group, respectively [P = 0.074, hazard ratio (HR) 0.804, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.633-1.022]. Ten patients in the tailored FEC regimen developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)/myelodysplasia (MDS). One hundred deaths occurred in the tailored FEC group and 121 in the CTCb group (P = 0.287, HR 0.866, 95% CI 0.665-1.129).

CONCLUSION

The update of this study shows an improved outcome linked to the tailored FEC treatment in relation to breast cancer relapse, but also an increased incidence of AML/MDS.

摘要

背景

目的是研究辅助性骨髓支持的大剂量化疗与毒性相当的对照治疗组相比的情况。

患者和方法

525名年龄在60岁以下、接受过手术的高危原发性乳腺癌女性被随机分为两组,一组接受9个周期的粒细胞集落刺激因子支持且个体化调整的FEC(5-氟尿嘧啶、表柔比星、环磷酰胺)治疗(n = 251),另一组接受标准FEC治疗,随后进行骨髓支持的大剂量CTCb(环磷酰胺、噻替派、卡铂)治疗(n = 274),之后进行局部区域放疗并服用他莫昔芬5年。

结果

个体化调整FEC治疗组有104例乳腺癌复发,CTCb治疗组有139例(怀特黑德双三角法,P = 0.046),所有纳入患者的中位随访时间为60.8个月。无事件生存期方面,个体化调整FEC治疗组和CTCb治疗组分别有121例和150例事件发生[P = 0.074,风险比(HR)0.804,95%置信区间(CI)0.633 - 1.022]。个体化调整FEC方案组有10名患者发生急性髓系白血病(AML)/骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)。个体化调整FEC治疗组有100例死亡,CTCb治疗组有121例死亡(P = 0.287,HR 0.866,95%CI 0.665 - 1.129)。

结论

本研究的更新结果显示,与CTCb治疗相比,个体化调整FEC治疗在乳腺癌复发方面有更好的结局,但AML/MDS的发病率也有所增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验