Suppr超能文献

[头环固定背心——适应证与并发症]

[Halo-fixator vest--indications and complications].

作者信息

Strohm P C, Müller Ch A, Köstler W, Reising K, Südkamp N P

机构信息

Klinikum der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Department für Orthopädie und Traumatologie.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 2007 Feb;132(1):54-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-960479.

Abstract

Over the period between 06/00 and 03/03, 41 patients with different injuries of the upper cervical spine were treated by a halo fixator and were statistically recorded. The collective showed different injury patterns, 2 fractures of occiput condyles (5%), 3 Jefferson fractures (7%), 1 combined injury of the odontoid process and an atlas fracture (2%), 32 odontoid fractures (78%), 2 hanged-man-fractures Typ Effendi II (5%) and one case of pathologic fractures from the 2. to the 4. cervical vertebral body based on a plasmocytoma (2%). 31 of 41 patients could be examined for a follow up; 40 complete medical histories were well documented and could be analysed. As complications we had screw loosening in 6 cases (15%), a complete tear out of screws in 2 cases (5%). One patient took the halo away by himself two times, so after the second time surgical stabilisation was performed (2,5%). One case of intracranial penetration of a screw happened after the patient fell down in an accident with the halo (2,5%). Infection of the screw pins appeared in 4 cases (10%) and we had 2 cases of skin necrosis (5%). A second reduction after redisplacement was necessary in 8 cases (20%). 23 patients suffered from pain at the insertion of the screws (75%) and 18 patients complained of pressure in the head (58%). On the question of the comfort of this kind of therapy answered 18 patients with "intolerable" (58%), 10 patients with middle (32%) and 3 patients with tolerable (10%). Despite of the large number of different complications and the miscomfort of a halo fixator we think that there are still indications for treatment of special injuries of the upper cervical spine with a halo fixator. One important aspect is the lack of adequate alternatives even with regard to the biomechanical stability.

摘要

在2000年6月至2003年3月期间,41例上颈椎不同损伤的患者接受了头环固定器治疗,并进行了统计记录。该组病例呈现出不同的损伤类型,枕髁骨折2例(5%),Jefferson骨折3例(7%),齿突合并寰椎骨折1例(2%),齿突骨折32例(78%),Effendi II型绞刑者骨折2例(5%),以及因浆细胞瘤导致第2至第4颈椎椎体病理性骨折1例(2%)。41例患者中有31例接受了随访检查;40份完整的病历记录完善,可供分析。并发症方面,螺钉松动6例(15%),螺钉完全拔出2例(5%)。1例患者自行取下头环两次,因此在第二次取下后进行了手术稳定治疗(2.5%)。1例患者在佩戴头环时因意外摔倒后发生螺钉颅内穿透(2.5%)。螺钉钉道感染4例(10%),皮肤坏死2例(5%)。8例(20%)患者在复位丢失后需要再次复位。23例患者在螺钉置入处疼痛(75%),18例患者主诉头部有压迫感(58%)。对于这种治疗方式的舒适度问题,18例患者回答“无法忍受”(58%),10例患者回答“中等”(32%),3例患者回答“可忍受”(10%)。尽管存在大量不同的并发症以及头环固定器带来的不适,但我们认为对于上颈椎的特殊损伤,头环固定器仍有治疗指征。一个重要方面是,即使在生物力学稳定性方面,也缺乏足够的替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验