Cedergreen Nina, Kudsk Per, Mathiassen Solvejg K, Streibig Jens C
Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University (KVL), Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Højbakkegård Allé 13, 2630 Taastrup, Denmark.
Pest Manag Sci. 2007 Mar;63(3):282-95. doi: 10.1002/ps.1353.
Risk assessment of herbicides towards non-target plants in Europe is currently based solely on tests on algae and floating aquatic plants of Lemna sp. Effects on terrestrial non-target species is not systematically addressed. The purpose of the present study was to compare combination effects of herbicide mixtures across aquatic and terrestrial test systems, and to test whether results obtained in the traditional aquatic test systems can be extrapolated to the terrestrial environment. This was done by evaluating ten binary mixtures of nine herbicides representing the seven most commonly used molecular target sites for controlling broadleaved weeds. Data were evaluated statistically in relation to the concentration addition model, and for selected concentrations to the independent action model. The mixtures were tested on the terrestrial species Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Schultz-Bip. (Scentless Mayweed) and Stellaria media (L.) Vill. (Common Chickweed), and on the aquatic species Lemna minor L. (Lesser duckweed) and the alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Korschikov) Hindak. For the two mixtures of herbicides with the same molecular site of action, the joint effect was additive. For the eight mixtures of herbicides with different sites of action, two of the mixtures were consistently antagonistic across species, while for the remaining six mixtures the joint effect depended on the species tested. This dependence was, however, not systematic, in the sense that none of the species or test systems (terrestrial versus aquatic) had a significantly higher probability of showing synergistic or antagonistic joint effects than others. Synergistic interactions were not observed, but approximately 70% of the mixtures of herbicides with different sites of action showed significant antagonism. Hence, the concentration addition model can be used to estimate worst-case effects of mixtures of herbicides on both terrestrial and aquatic species. Comparing the sensitivity of the species to a 10% spray drift event showed that the terrestrial species were more vulnerable to all herbicides compared with the aquatic species, emphasising the importance of including terrestrial non-target plants in herbicide risk assessment.
目前,欧洲对除草剂对非靶标植物的风险评估仅基于对藻类和浮萍属漂浮水生植物的测试。对陆地非靶标物种的影响并未得到系统研究。本研究的目的是比较除草剂混合物在水生和陆地测试系统中的联合效应,并测试在传统水生测试系统中获得的结果是否可以外推到陆地环境。通过评估代表控制阔叶杂草的七个最常用分子靶标的九种除草剂的十种二元混合物来实现这一目的。数据根据浓度加和模型进行统计评估,并针对选定浓度根据独立作用模型进行评估。这些混合物在陆地物种无香味母菊(Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Schultz-Bip.)和繁缕(Stellaria media (L.) Vill.)以及水生物种小浮萍(Lemna minor L.)和藻类假微型海链藻(Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Korschikov) Hindak)上进行了测试。对于具有相同分子作用位点的两种除草剂混合物,联合效应是相加的。对于具有不同作用位点的八种除草剂混合物,其中两种混合物在所有物种中均表现出一致的拮抗作用,而对于其余六种混合物,联合效应取决于所测试的物种。然而,这种依赖性并非系统性的,即没有一个物种或测试系统(陆地与水生)比其他物种或测试系统更有可能表现出协同或拮抗的联合效应。未观察到协同相互作用,但约70%的具有不同作用位点的除草剂混合物表现出显著的拮抗作用。因此,浓度加和模型可用于估计除草剂混合物对陆地和水生物种的最坏情况影响。比较物种对10%喷雾漂移事件的敏感性表明,与水生物种相比,陆生物种对所有除草剂更敏感,这强调了在除草剂风险评估中纳入陆地非靶标植物的重要性。