Li Chi-Keung, Yang Chi-Ting, Poon Nai-Leung, Fung Wing-Kam
Questioned Documents Section, Ho Man Tin Government Laboratory, 88 Chung Hau Street, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Mar;52(2):467-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00355.x.
This paper reports a statistical study on the sequence of strokes of 61 commonly encountered Chinese radicals and characters written by 372 invited subjects. The distribution of different writing sequence of these Chinese radicals and characters was examined. Comparison of the sequence of strokes executed by the subjects with the standard rule of writing these Chinese radicals and characters revealed that around 60% of the subjects wrote in the correct sequence. Pair comparison of sequences of strokes in Chinese handwriting among the 372 subjects was also performed. The results demonstrated that no two individuals wrote all the 61 radicals and characters with the same sequence of strokes. The findings indicate that, despite some basic rules governing the writing sequence of Chinese characters, writers tend to develop their own habits. The findings also support the hypothesis that the handwriting of experienced writers is individual.
本文报告了一项关于372名受邀受试者书写61个常见汉字部首和汉字笔画顺序的统计研究。研究了这些汉字部首和汉字不同书写顺序的分布情况。将受试者的笔画顺序与这些汉字部首和汉字的标准书写规则进行比较,结果显示约60%的受试者书写顺序正确。同时还对372名受试者的中文手写笔画顺序进行了两两比较。结果表明,没有两个人书写所有61个部首和汉字的笔画顺序完全相同。研究结果表明,尽管汉字书写顺序有一些基本规则,但书写者倾向于形成自己的习惯。这些发现也支持了经验丰富的书写者的笔迹具有个体性这一假设。