Aimonino N, Tibaldi V, Barale S, Bardelli B, Pilon S, Marchetto C, Zanocchi M, Molaschi M
Department of Medical and Surgical Disciplines, Geriatric Section, University of Torino, S. Giovanni Battista Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, I-10126 Torino, Italy.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2007;44 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.01.002.
Aim of the study was to evaluate mortality and functional, cognitive, affective status in elderly patients (>or=75 years) with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or acute congestive heart failure (CHF) admitted to the emergency department (ED) of S. Giovanni Battista Hospital of Torino and randomly assigned to the geriatric home hospitalization service (GHHS) or to a general medical ward (GMW). All patients were evaluated on admission, on discharge and at 6 months, using a standardized study protocol. We excluded patients with unstable medical conditions. The total sample included 73 patients: 35 with COPD exacerbation (19 GHHS, 16 GMW) and 38 with CHF (19 GHHS, 19 GMW). Mean age was 81.7+/-8.0 years. At baseline, no significant differences in demographic, social and clinical conditions were found between the two groups of patients. 56.7% of COPD patients had a severe exacerbation, according to Anthonisen criteria; 65% of CHF patients were NYHA-III and 35% NYHA-IV (according to the criteria of the New York Heart Association) (FE<35% in 40% of patients). On admission all patients were partially dependent in ADLs and IADLs, with a moderate impairment of depression score and a fairly good quality of life. On discharge depression score and quality of life were significantly better only in GHHS patients. Mortality was similar in the two setting of care. Patients managed at home had a significantly longer length of treatment. At 6-month follow-up we did not observe a difference in mortality, but we observed a higher readmission rate in patients previously treated in hospital. In conclusion, our study indicates that home-treated patients with COPD or CHF have better depressive scores and quality of life and a lower rate of hospital readmission after six months.
本研究的目的是评估因慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重或急性充血性心力衰竭(CHF)而入住都灵圣乔瓦尼·巴蒂斯塔医院急诊科(ED)的老年患者(≥75岁)的死亡率、功能、认知和情感状况,这些患者被随机分配到老年家庭住院服务(GHHS)或普通内科病房(GMW)。所有患者在入院时、出院时和6个月时均按照标准化研究方案进行评估。我们排除了病情不稳定的患者。总样本包括73例患者:35例COPD急性加重患者(19例接受GHHS治疗,16例接受GMW治疗)和38例CHF患者(19例接受GHHS治疗,19例接受GMW治疗)。平均年龄为81.7±8.0岁。基线时,两组患者在人口统计学、社会和临床状况方面未发现显著差异。根据安东尼森标准,56.7%的COPD患者发生了严重急性加重;65%的CHF患者为纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III级,35%为NYHA-IV级(根据纽约心脏协会标准)(40%的患者FE<35%)。入院时,所有患者在日常生活活动(ADL)和工具性日常生活活动(IADL)方面均部分依赖他人,抑郁评分有中度损害,生活质量相当不错。出院时,仅GHHS患者的抑郁评分和生活质量有显著改善。两种护理环境下的死亡率相似。在家接受治疗的患者治疗时间明显更长。在6个月的随访中,我们未观察到死亡率有差异,但我们观察到先前在医院接受治疗的患者再入院率更高。总之,我们的研究表明,接受家庭治疗的COPD或CHF患者抑郁评分和生活质量更好,6个月后医院再入院率更低。