Suppr超能文献

巴西的比较生物化学与生理学:批判性评估。

Comparative biochemistry and physiology in Brazil: a critical appraisal.

作者信息

Navas Carlos Arturo, Chaui-Berlinck José Guilherme, Bicudo José Eduardo P W, Pivello Vânia R, Martins Marcio

机构信息

Departamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-900, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.

Departamento de Fisiologia, Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, 05508-900, São Paulo/SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2007 Jul;147(3):586-593. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.025. Epub 2007 Feb 2.

Abstract

Brazil stood out as the country with the highest number of submissions to the editorial project dedicated to Latin America by the journal Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Therefore, we felt that it was important to critically discuss the state of comparative biochemistry and physiology in this country. Our study is based on data collected from the ISI Web-of-Science. We analyzed publication trends through time, availability of novel approaches and techniques, patterns of collaboration among different geographical regions, patterns of collaboration with researchers abroad, and relative efforts dedicated to the study of biochemical and physiological adaptation of native fauna representing different terrestrial Brazilian biomes. Overall, our data shows that comparative biochemistry and physiology is a lively and productive discipline, but that some biases limit the scope of the field in Brazil. Some important limitations are the very heterogeneous distribution of research nuclei throughout the country and the absence of some important approaches, such as remote sensing and the use of molecular biology techniques in a comparative or evolutionary context. We also noticed that international collaboration far surpasses interregional collaboration, and discuss the possible causes and consequences of this situation. Finally, we found that Brazilian comparative biochemistry and physiology is biome-biased, as the Amazonian fauna has received far more attention than the whole pool of fauna representing other terrestrial biomes. We discuss the possible causes of these biases, and propose some directions that may contribute to invigorate the field in the country.

摘要

巴西是向《比较生物化学与生理学》期刊拉丁美洲编辑项目投稿数量最多的国家。因此,我们认为批判性地讨论该国比较生物化学与生理学的现状很重要。我们的研究基于从ISI科学网收集的数据。我们分析了随时间推移的出版趋势、新方法和新技术的可用性、不同地理区域之间的合作模式、与国外研究人员的合作模式,以及致力于研究代表巴西不同陆地生物群落的本土动物生化和生理适应的相对努力。总体而言,我们的数据表明比较生物化学与生理学是一个活跃且富有成效的学科,但一些偏见限制了巴西该领域的范围。一些重要的局限性包括研究核心在全国分布非常不均,以及缺乏一些重要方法,如遥感以及在比较或进化背景下使用分子生物学技术。我们还注意到国际合作远远超过区域间合作,并讨论了这种情况的可能原因和后果。最后,我们发现巴西的比较生物化学与生理学存在生物群落偏见,因为亚马逊动物群受到的关注远远超过代表其他陆地生物群落的整个动物群。我们讨论了这些偏见的可能原因,并提出了一些可能有助于振兴该国该领域的方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验