Carroll W J, Haug R H, Bissada N F, Goldberg J, Hans M
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, MetroHealth Medical Center of Cleveland, OH 44109.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Feb;50(2):128-32. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(92)90357-6.
Two age-matched populations of equal size (n = 40), one having orthodontic therapy and the other combined orthodontic therapy and orthognathic surgery, were evaluated for their periodontal status 1 to 10 years posttherapy. The parameters investigated were plaque index, gingival index, tooth mobility, width of keratinized tissue, probing depth, gingival recession, and attachment level. No significant differences were found (P less than .05). Within the surgery group, patients with maxillary osteotomies segmentalized between the central incisors (n = 11) and between the canines and second premolars (n = 12) were evaluated using the same parameters and compared with their nonsegmental counterparts. No significant differences were found for patients with osteotomies segmentalized between the central incisors. However, a statistically significant increase in probe depth and loss of attachment level of up to 0.3 mm was found at the sites of osteotomies segmentalized between the canine and second premolar (P less than .05). This difference was not considered clinically significant.
