Gueth Uwe, Wight Edward, Schoetzau Andreas, Langer Igor, Dieterich Holger, Rochlitz Christoph, Herberich Linda, Holzgreve Wolfgang, Singer Gad
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel (UHB), Spitalstrasse, Basel, Switzerland.
J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar 15;95(4):291-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.20660.
The study evaluates characteristics and prognostic significance of breast cancer with histologically proven non-inflammatory skin involvement but without the clinical and histological features that are mandatory for inclusion in the T4 category.
We compared retrospectively the clinical course of 55 patients with this clinico-pathologic entity to the outcome of a control group of 309 consecutive patients with tumors of the same size but without skin involvement. The median follow-up time was 6.6 years in the study and 8.4 years in the control group. Two subsets were analyzed: (A) 1.1-2.0 cm (T1c); (B) 2.1-5.0 cm (T2).
The distribution of TNM stages within Study Group A was: Stage I: 28.6%, Stage II: 61.9%, Stage III: 9.5%. The distribution within Study Group B was: Stage II: 67.7%, Stage III: 23.5%, and Stage IV: 8.8%. Differences in disease-specific survival (DSS) between study and control groups were not significant. In multivariate analysis, skin involvement was not a significant variable, while lymph node involvement was found to be significant for worse outcome (Group A: HR=3.99 [1.33-12.05], P=0.014; Group B: HR=2.37 [1.37-4.08], P=0.002).
Breast carcinomas with histologically proven skin involvement without the clinical and histological correlate are a heterogeneous group of cases, but the majority of the patients have Stage I/II disease. While lymph node involvement had a most significant effect on DSS, skin involvement was not a significant prognostic factor. Physicians must be aware of this clinico-pathologic entity in order not to misclassify these cases as T4 and consider them falsely as being locally advanced breast cancer.
本研究评估经组织学证实有非炎性皮肤受累但无T4分类所必需的临床及组织学特征的乳腺癌的特点及预后意义。
我们回顾性比较了55例具有这种临床病理实体的患者与309例连续的肿瘤大小相同但无皮肤受累的对照组患者的临床病程。研究组的中位随访时间为6.6年,对照组为8.4年。分析了两个亚组:(A) 1.1 - 2.0 cm(T1c);(B) 2.1 - 5.0 cm(T2)。
研究组A内TNM分期分布为:I期:28.6%,II期:61.9%,III期:9.5%。研究组B内的分布为:II期:67.7%,III期:23.5%,IV期:8.8%。研究组与对照组之间的疾病特异性生存率(DSS)差异无统计学意义。在多因素分析中,皮肤受累不是一个显著变量,而淋巴结受累被发现对预后较差有显著意义(A组:HR = 3.99 [1.33 - 12.05],P = 0.014;B组:HR = 2.37 [1.37 - 4.08],P = 0.002)。
经组织学证实有皮肤受累但无临床及组织学相关表现的乳腺癌是一组异质性病例,但大多数患者为I/II期疾病。虽然淋巴结受累对DSS有最显著影响,但皮肤受累不是一个显著的预后因素。医生必须了解这种临床病理实体,以免将这些病例错误分类为T4,并错误地将其视为局部晚期乳腺癌。