Legendre C, Kreis H, Bach J F, Chatenoud L
Service de Transplantation, Hôpital Necker, Paris, France.
Transplantation. 1992 Jan;53(1):87-90. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199201000-00016.
OKT3 is considered to be effective in the prophylaxis and treatment of rejection. However, anti-OKT3 immunization is still a major side-effect. Only the IgG antiidiotypic component of the response is responsible for neutralization of OKT3 therapeutic activity by inhibiting OKT3's binding to T cells (i.e., blocking antibodies). It has recently been reported that successful OKT3 retreatment could be performed in patients showing circulating anti-OKT3 antibodies assessed by ELISA, which does not distinguish between blocking and nonblocking antibodies. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of these two types of anti-OKT3 antibodies for their capacity to interfere with effective OKT3 retreatment. Twelve cadaver renal allograft recipients who received OKT3 inducing therapy, were given a second 10 day-course of OKT3 for treatment of rejection. Circulating CD3+ cells were sequentially monitored. Anti-OKT3 antibodies were detected by using both conventional ELISA and an immunofluorescence inhibition test specifically detecting blocking antibodies. OKT3 and the patient's serum were incubated for 30 min at 4 degrees C, and 2 x 10(5) normal T cells were added (30 min at 4 degrees C). After washing, the cells were incubated with FITC goat antimouse antiserum. Fluorescent cells were counted using a FACS analyzer. In 10 patients, at the end of the 10-day second course, less than 10% circulating CD3+ cells were detected. None of these patients had detectable antibodies in the IF inhibition assay at the beginning of retreatment, irrespective of anti-OKT3 antibody titers detected by ELISA. In contrast, in two patients, OKT3 therapy was ineffective: more than 50% circulating CD3+ cells were detected and OKT3 treatment had to be interrupted soon after it was initiated. In both of them, blocking antibodies were detected by the IF-inhibition assay. These results suggest that specific detection of blocking antiidiotypic antibodies by the IF inhibition assay is a reliable parameter for predicting the feasibility of OKT3 retreatment, avoiding misuse of this expensive therapy.
OKT3被认为在预防和治疗排斥反应方面有效。然而,抗OKT3免疫仍是一个主要的副作用。只有应答中的IgG抗独特型成分通过抑制OKT3与T细胞的结合(即阻断抗体)来中和OKT3的治疗活性。最近有报道称,对于通过ELISA检测出循环抗OKT3抗体的患者,可以成功进行OKT3再治疗,而ELISA无法区分阻断抗体和非阻断抗体。本研究的目的是调查这两种类型的抗OKT3抗体对有效OKT3再治疗的干扰能力。12名接受OKT3诱导治疗的尸体肾移植受者,接受了第二个为期10天的OKT3疗程以治疗排斥反应。对循环中的CD3+细胞进行了连续监测。通过常规ELISA和专门检测阻断抗体的免疫荧光抑制试验检测抗OKT3抗体。将OKT3与患者血清在4℃孵育30分钟,然后加入2×10(5)个正常T细胞(在4℃孵育30分钟)。洗涤后,将细胞与异硫氰酸荧光素(FITC)山羊抗小鼠抗血清孵育。使用流式细胞分析仪对荧光细胞进行计数。在10名患者中,在第二个为期10天的疗程结束时,检测到循环CD3+细胞少于10%。这些患者在再治疗开始时,无论ELISA检测出的抗OKT3抗体滴度如何,在免疫荧光抑制试验中均未检测到可检测的抗体。相比之下,在两名患者中,OKT3治疗无效:检测到循环CD3+细胞超过50%,OKT3治疗在开始后不久就不得不中断。在这两名患者中,通过免疫荧光抑制试验检测到了阻断抗体。这些结果表明,通过免疫荧光抑制试验特异性检测阻断抗独特型抗体是预测OKT3再治疗可行性的可靠参数,可避免滥用这种昂贵的治疗方法。