Hendrich C, Engelmaier F, Mehling I, Sauer U, Kirschner S, Martell J M
Department of Orthopaedics, Würzburg University, Germany.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Mar;89 Suppl 2 Pt.1:54-67. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01045.
Studies of acetabular reconstruction with use of cement and bulk bone graft have demonstrated increasing rates of cup failure in patients with dysplastic hips seven years after total hip arthroplasty. Comparable data on the long-term results of bulk bone-grafting done in conjunction with cementless implants are limited. The aim of this study was to review the clinical and radiographic results of autologous bulk bone-grafting in conjunction with a cementless cup.
From 1987 to 1992, forty-seven patients (forty women and seven men, with an average age of 50.4 years) who had developmental dysplasia of the hip underwent fifty-six total hip arthroplasties and received a structural graft in combination with a cementless Harris-Galante type-I cup. All patients were followed prospectively. In fifty-five hips, implant migration was measured with single-image radiographic analysis.
After an average duration (and standard deviation) of 10.2 +/- 2.9 years, three patients (four hips) had died. In the surviving patients, four implants had been revised and two had radiographic evidence of loosening. With use of revision and loosening as end points, the eleven-year survival rates were 91.6% and 88.9%, respectively. Of the fifty implants that had no loosening, fourteen had measurable cup migration, thirty-five had no migration, and one implant could not be measured. All migrations but one were progressive. With loosening used as the end point, the survival rate at eleven years was 100% for the implants with no migration; however, the survival rate for the cups that had migrated was 69.3% (p = 0.0012).
The eleven-year survival rate for the spherical press-fit cups in combination with bulk bone-grafting is satisfactory, given the complexity of these reconstructions. However, the difference between the survival of the implants that had migrated and those that had not was significant. We expect that the thirteen implants with progressive acetabular migration at the time of the latest follow-up are at risk for loosening, which will increase the revision rate for this series in the coming years.
使用骨水泥和大块骨移植进行髋臼重建的研究表明,发育性髋关节发育不良患者在全髋关节置换术后七年,髋臼杯失败率不断上升。关于与非骨水泥型植入物联合使用大块骨移植的长期结果的类似数据有限。本研究的目的是回顾自体大块骨移植联合非骨水泥髋臼杯的临床和影像学结果。
1987年至1992年,47例(40例女性和7例男性,平均年龄50.4岁)髋关节发育不良患者接受了56次全髋关节置换术,并接受了结构性植骨联合非骨水泥型Harris-Galante I型髋臼杯。所有患者均进行前瞻性随访。在55个髋关节中,通过单图像放射学分析测量植入物移位情况。
平均随访时间(标准差)为10.2±2.9年,3例患者(4个髋关节)死亡。在存活患者中,4个植入物进行了翻修,2个有影像学松动证据。以翻修和松动为终点,11年生存率分别为91.6%和88.9%。在50个未松动的植入物中,14个髋臼杯有可测量的移位,35个无移位,1个植入物无法测量。除1例移位外,所有移位均为进展性。以松动为终点,无移位植入物11年生存率为100%;然而,有移位的髋臼杯生存率为69.3%(p = 0.0012)。
考虑到这些重建手术的复杂性,球形压配髋臼杯联合大块骨移植的11年生存率令人满意。然而,有移位和无移位植入物的生存率差异显著。我们预计,在最近一次随访时髋臼有进展性移位的13个植入物有松动风险,这将增加该系列患者未来几年的翻修率。