Parratte S, Argenson J-N, Flecher X, Aubaniac J-M
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, CHU Sud, Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, 270, boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, BP 29, 13274 Marseille Cedex 09.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007 May;93(3):255-63. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(07)90247-0.
Impaction grafting can be used in cementless fixation with morsellized bone, bone graft, and hemispherical cup. The first goal of impaction grafting in revision of total hip arthroplasty is to transform segmental defects into cavitary defects and obtain a full compaction of the graft in order to restore the bone stock. The second goal is to achieve primary stability of the cup. The third goal is to restore the hip center of rotation with a cup anatomically located in the acetabulum. The aim of our study was to evaluate the results of a surgical technique with impacted morsellized bone graft and a cementless press-fit cup for the revision with defect type III according to the AAOS classification.
We performed a retrospective study including 34 hip reconstructions during revision of acetabular aseptic loosening with type III AAOS acetabular defects. All the revisions were performed in the same center by two senior surgeons. Mean age at surgery was 58 years. There were 23 women and 11 men. All reconstructions were performed with a cementless cup and a morsellized impacted bone graft. The analysis of the acetabular defects was done preoperatively according to the AAOS classification. We analyzed postoperatively and at follow-up: position and stability of the acetabular cup, restoration of the hip center and graft integration.
Mean follow-up was 6.6 years (range 3-13 years). Complications included three dislocations, two trochaanteric nonunions. Two acetabular components were revised for septic loosening. According to the Kaplan-Meier survival curves, with endpoint criteria defined as acetabular cup removal, survival was 91.3% at 10 years (95CI: 86.3-96.3). The preoperative Harris hip score was 53 points (range 26-86) and at last follow-up 94 (47-100). Concerning the subjective clinical outcome, 96% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied at last follow-up. 100% of cups were considered stable at follow-up and bone integration was good in 100%. The center of rotation was located in anatomic position mediolaterally in 66% and in the craniopodal plane in 44%.
Restoration of bone stock is one of the main goals during hip reconstruction after aseptic loosening. Clinical experience in our series has shown the reliability of the impacted morsellized bone graft allowing relocation of the center of rotation and good cup stability. Biological fixation of the cup and graft integration seems good at mid-term follow-up. The cup that we used in our series combined the advantages of a press-fit cup and those of a reinforcement ring. The combination of this type of cup with morsellized bone graft seems to be a reliable solution for restoring bone stock, relocating the hip center, and stabilizing the cup in revision total hip arthroplasty with type III acetabular defect according to the AAOS classification.
打压植骨可用于使用碎骨块、骨移植材料和半球形髋臼杯的非骨水泥固定。全髋关节置换翻修术中打压植骨的首要目标是将节段性骨缺损转化为腔隙性骨缺损,并使移植材料充分压实,以恢复骨量。第二个目标是实现髋臼杯的初始稳定性。第三个目标是通过将髋臼杯解剖定位在髋臼中来恢复髋关节旋转中心。本研究的目的是根据美国矫形外科医师学会(AAOS)分类法,评估使用打压碎骨块植骨和非骨水泥压配型髋臼杯的手术技术对III型缺损进行翻修的结果。
我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了34例因AAOS III型髋臼无菌性松动而进行髋臼翻修的髋关节重建病例。所有翻修手术均由两位资深外科医生在同一中心完成。手术时的平均年龄为58岁。其中女性23例,男性11例。所有重建均使用非骨水泥髋臼杯和碎骨块打压植骨。术前根据AAOS分类法对髋臼缺损进行分析。我们在术后及随访时分析了:髋臼杯的位置和稳定性、髋关节中心的恢复情况以及移植材料的整合情况。
平均随访时间为6.6年(范围3 - 13年)。并发症包括3例脱位、2例转子间骨不连。2例髋臼组件因感染性松动而进行了翻修。根据Kaplan - Meier生存曲线,以髋臼杯取出作为终点标准,10年时的生存率为91.3%(95%置信区间:86.3 - 96.3)。术前Harris髋关节评分平均为53分(范围26 - 86分),末次随访时为94分(47 - 100分)。关于主观临床结果,96%的患者在末次随访时表示满意或非常满意。随访时100%的髋臼杯被认为稳定,100%的骨整合良好。旋转中心在内侧 - 外侧平面位于解剖位置的占66%,在头 - 足平面位于解剖位置的占44%。
恢复骨量是无菌性松动后髋关节重建的主要目标之一。我们系列研究中的临床经验表明,打压碎骨块植骨可靠,可使旋转中心复位并使髋臼杯稳定性良好。在中期随访时,髋臼杯的生物固定和移植材料的整合似乎良好。我们系列研究中使用的髋臼杯结合了压配型髋臼杯和加强环的优点。这种类型的髋臼杯与碎骨块植骨相结合,似乎是根据AAOS分类法对III型髋臼缺损的全髋关节置换翻修术中恢复骨量、重新定位髋关节中心以及稳定髋臼杯的可靠解决方案。