Hull-Sanders Helen M, Clare Robert, Johnson Robert H, Meyer Gretchen A
Canisius College, 2001 Main St., Buffalo, NY, 14208, USA,
J Chem Ecol. 2007 Apr;33(4):781-99. doi: 10.1007/s10886-007-9252-y. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
The evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA) hypothesis predicts that invasive plant species may escape their specialized natural enemies in their introduced range and subsequently evolve with a decrease in investment in anti-herbivore chemical defenses relative to native conspecifics. We compared the chemical profile of 10 populations of US native and 20 populations of European invasive Solidago gigantea. To test for differences in inducibility between native and invasive populations, we measured secondary chemistry in both damaged and undamaged plants. We also performed bioassays with three specialist and two generalist insect herbivores from four different feeding guilds. There was no evidence that invasive populations had reduced concentrations of sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, or short-chain hydrocarbons (SCH), although significant variation among populations was detected. Sesquiterpene and diterpene concentrations were not influenced by damage to the host plant, whereas SCH concentrations were decreased by damage for both native and invasive plants. Performance of the three specialist insects was not affected by the continental origin of the host plant. However, larval mass of the generalist caterpillar Spodoptera exigua was 37% lower on native plants compared to invasive plants. The other generalist insect, a xylem-tapping spittlebug that occurs on both continents, performed equally well on native and invasive plants. These results offer partial support for the defense predictions of the EICA hypothesis: the better growth of Spodoptera caterpillars on European plants shows that some defenses have been lost in the introduced range, even though our measures of secondary chemistry did not detect differences between continents. Our results show significant variation in chemical defenses and herbivore performance across populations on both continents and emphasize the need for analysis across a broad spatial scale and the use of multiple herbivores.
竞争能力增强进化(EICA)假说预测,入侵植物物种在其引入地可能会摆脱其特有的天敌,随后相对于本地同种植物,在抗食草动物化学防御方面的投入减少,从而发生进化。我们比较了10个美国本土种群和20个欧洲入侵种群的巨花一枝黄花的化学特征。为了测试本土种群和入侵种群在诱导性方面的差异,我们测量了受损和未受损植物的次生化学物质。我们还对来自四个不同取食类群的三种专食性和两种广食性昆虫食草动物进行了生物测定。没有证据表明入侵种群的倍半萜、二萜或短链碳氢化合物(SCH)浓度降低,尽管检测到种群间存在显著差异。倍半萜和二萜浓度不受寄主植物损伤的影响,而本土和入侵植物的SCH浓度均因损伤而降低。三种专食性昆虫的表现不受寄主植物大陆来源的影响。然而,广食性毛虫甜菜夜蛾的幼虫在本土植物上的体重比在入侵植物上低37%。另一种广食性昆虫,一种在两大洲都有出现的吸食木质部的沫蝉,在本土和入侵植物上的表现同样良好。这些结果为EICA假说的防御预测提供了部分支持:甜菜夜蛾幼虫在欧洲植物上生长得更好,这表明在引入地一些防御已经丧失,尽管我们对次生化学物质的测量未检测到大陆间的差异。我们的结果表明,两大洲的种群在化学防御和食草动物表现方面存在显著差异,并强调了在广泛空间尺度上进行分析和使用多种食草动物的必要性。