Austin David, Kiropoulos Litza
Department of General Practice, Monash University, East Bentleigh, Victoria, Australia.
J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22(2):233-42. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.01.013. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
The catastrophic misinterpretation (CM) model of panic disorder proposes that spontaneous panic attacks are the result of interpretation of harmless autonomic arousal as precursors to physical (e.g., heart attack) or psychological (e.g., insanity) emergency. Mixed research findings to date have provided equivocal support. The body sensations interpretation questionnaire-modified was administered via Internet to investigate core assumptions of the model among 30 people with panic disorder (PD), 28 with social anxiety disorder (SAD), and 30 non-anxious controls. The PD group gave more harm-related interpretations of ambiguous internal stimuli than both other groups, and this tendency to interpret ambiguous stimuli catastrophically was not also apparent for external/general events. Furthermore, people with PD rated harm and anxiety outcomes as more catastrophic than non-anxious controls. Results substantially support the CM model although a modification is proposed.
惊恐障碍的灾难性误解(CM)模型提出,自发性惊恐发作是将无害的自主神经觉醒解读为身体(如心脏病发作)或心理(如精神错乱)紧急情况先兆的结果。迄今为止的混合研究结果提供了模棱两可的支持。通过互联网发放修改后的身体感觉解释问卷,以调查30名惊恐障碍(PD)患者、28名社交焦虑障碍(SAD)患者和30名非焦虑对照者对该模型核心假设的情况。与其他两组相比,PD组对模糊内部刺激给出了更多与伤害相关的解释,而这种对模糊刺激进行灾难性解读的倾向在外部/一般事件中并不明显。此外,PD患者对伤害和焦虑结果的评级比非焦虑对照者更具灾难性。尽管提出了一项修改意见,但结果基本上支持CM模型。