Maastricht University, Institute for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 5;8(8):e70315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070315. Print 2013.
In cognitive theory it is hypothesized that panic attacks are provoked by catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily sensations. The aim of the present study was to investigate the ability of associated word pairs referring to catastrophic thinking (e.g. palpitations-heart attack) in producing panic attacks. Patients with PD (n = 20), patients with mixed anxiety disorders (n = 20), and a healthy control group (n = 30) participated in the present study. To enhance ecological validity we first conducted a stimulus validation experiment. Subsequently, nine suitable panic and neutral word pairs were presented in block to the participants. Anxiety levels were assessed before and after the presentation. PD patients were more anxious when reading these word pairs, compared to neutral word pairs. However, none of the participants experienced a panic attack upon reading the word pairs. From the present results it seems that catastrophic thinking is rather related to the anticipatory anxiety for panic attacks, but not necessarily with the occurrence of the panic attacks themselves.
在认知理论中,有人假设恐慌发作是由对身体感觉的灾难性误解引起的。本研究的目的是调查与灾难性思维相关的词对(例如心悸-心脏病发作)在引发恐慌发作方面的能力。PD 患者(n=20)、混合焦虑障碍患者(n=20)和健康对照组(n=30)参加了本研究。为了提高生态效度,我们首先进行了刺激验证实验。随后,将九个合适的恐慌和中性词对以块的形式呈现给参与者。在呈现之前和之后评估焦虑水平。与中性词对相比,阅读这些词对时,PD 患者更焦虑。然而,没有参与者在读这些词对时出现恐慌发作。从目前的结果来看,灾难性思维似乎与对恐慌发作的预期焦虑有关,但不一定与恐慌发作的发生有关。