• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)替代私人保险:2002年在十个州进行的评估结果。

Substitution of SCHIP for private coverage: results from a 2002 evaluation in ten states.

作者信息

Sommers Anna, Zuckerman Stephen, Dubay Lisa, Kenney Genevieve

机构信息

Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):529-37. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.529.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.529
PMID:17339683
Abstract

This paper examines the extent to which the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) might be substituting for private health insurance coverage at the time of enrollment. Among children who were newly enrolled in SCHIP in 2002 in ten states, about 14 percent had private coverage that they could have retained as an alternative to SCHIP. Of this 14 percent, about half of parents reported that the private coverage was unaffordable compared with SCHIP. This suggests that relatively few SCHIP enrollees could have retained private coverage and that even fewer had parents who felt that the option was affordable.

摘要

本文探讨了儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)在参保时替代私人医疗保险覆盖范围的程度。在2002年十个州新加入SCHIP的儿童中,约14%的儿童拥有私人保险,他们本可以保留该保险作为SCHIP的替代方案。在这14%的儿童中,约一半的家长表示,与SCHIP相比,私人保险费用过高。这表明,相对较少的SCHIP参保儿童本可以保留私人保险,而觉得该选择费用可承受的家长则更少。

相似文献

1
Substitution of SCHIP for private coverage: results from a 2002 evaluation in ten states.儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)替代私人保险:2002年在十个州进行的评估结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):529-37. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.2.529.
2
The impacts of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on children who enroll: findings from ten states.儿童健康保险计划对参保儿童的影响:来自十个州的调查结果
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1520-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00707.x.
3
The evolution of the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in New York: changing program features and enrollee characteristics.纽约州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)的发展:项目特征与参保人特点的变化
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e542.
4
Why millions of children eligible for Medicaid and SCHIP are uninsured: poor retention versus poor take-up.为何数百万符合医疗补助计划(Medicaid)和儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)资格的儿童没有保险:参保率低与登记率低的问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w560-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w560. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
5
The effect of the State Children's Health Insurance Program on health insurance coverage.儿童健康保险计划对医疗保险覆盖范围的影响。
J Health Econ. 2004 Sep;23(5):1059-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.03.006.
6
Adolescents' preventive care experiences before entry into the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).青少年在加入儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)之前的预防保健经历。
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e533.
7
Coping with SCHIP enrollment caps: lessons from seven states' experiences.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):258-68. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.258.
8
Dynamics in Medicaid and SCHIP eligibility among children in SCHIP's early years: implications for reauthorization.儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)早期阶段医疗补助计划(Medicaid)和SCHIP资格的动态变化:对重新授权的影响
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):w598-607. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.w598. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
9
The relationship between SCHIP enrollment and hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions in California.加利福尼亚州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)参保情况与门诊医疗敏感疾病住院率之间的关系。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2005 Feb;16(1):96-110. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2005.0003.
10
Who's enrolled in the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)? An overview of findings from the Child Health Insurance Research Initiative (CHIRI).谁参加了州儿童健康保险计划(SCHIP)?儿童健康保险研究倡议(CHIRI)的调查结果概述。
Pediatrics. 2003 Dec;112(6 Pt 2):e499.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the accessibility and value of U.S. ambulatory care among Medicaid expansion states and non-expansion states, 2012-2015.评估 2012-2015 年美国在扩大医疗补助计划的州和非扩大医疗补助计划的州的门诊护理的可及性和价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 3;23(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09696-x.
2
Medicaid Expansion and ACA Repeal: Evidence From Ohio.医疗补助扩大与《平价医疗法案》废除:来自俄亥俄州的证据
Am J Public Health. 2017 Jun;107(6):889-892. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303722. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Children's Insurance Coverage and Crowd-Out Through the Recession: Lessons From Ohio.
儿童保险覆盖范围与衰退期间的挤出效应:来自俄亥俄州的经验教训
Am J Public Health. 2015 Oct;105(10):2021-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302451. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
4
State variability in children's Medicaid/CHIP crowd-out estimates.儿童医疗补助/儿童健康保险计划挤出效应估计中的州差异。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Jul 11;3(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.03.a01. eCollection 2013.
5
Income eligibility thresholds, premium contributions, and children's coverage outcomes: a study of CHIP expansions.收入资格门槛、保费缴纳和儿童参保结果:对 CHIP 扩围的研究。
Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr;48(2 Pt 2):884-904. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12039. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
6
Take-up of public insurance and crowd-out of private insurance under recent CHIP expansions to higher income children.在最近的儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)扩大覆盖高收入儿童的计划中,公共保险的普及和私人保险的挤出。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):1999-2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01408.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
7
Public-private substitution among Medicaid adults: evidence from Ohio.医疗补助计划成年人群中的公私医疗替换:来自俄亥俄州的证据
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2011 Mar 31;1(1):001.01.a01. doi: 10.5600/mmrr.001.01.a01.
8
Transitions from private to public health coverage among children: estimating effects on out-of-pocket medical costs and health insurance premium costs.儿童从私人医疗保险到公共医疗保险的转变:估计对自付医疗费用和健康保险费的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Jun;46(3):840-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01238.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
9
The impact of CHIP on children's insurance coverage: an analysis using the National Survey of America's Families.CHIP 对儿童保险覆盖范围的影响:基于美国家庭全国调查的分析。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec;44(6):2040-59. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01040.x. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
10
Medicaid and SCHIP coverage: findings from California and North Carolina.医疗补助计划和儿童健康保险计划覆盖范围:加利福尼亚州和北卡罗来纳州的调查结果。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Fall;29(1):71-85.