Bibl M, Mollenhauer B, Lewczuk P, Esselmann H, Wolf S, Trenkwalder C, Otto M, Stiens G, Rüther E, Kornhuber J, Wiltfang J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Mol Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;12(7):671-80. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001967. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
Biomarkers for differential diagnosis of the three most frequent degenerative forms of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and frontotemporal dementias (FTD), are currently under intensive investigation, but disease-specific biomarkers for FTD and DLB are still lacking. We analyzed 303 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples of 71 AD, 32 DLB and 36 FTD patients in comparison to 93 various other dementias (OD), 20 peripheral neurologic disease (PND) controls, 25 neurodegenerative disorders without dementia (ND) and 26 depressive cognitive complainers (DCC) for distinct CSF amyloid-beta (Abeta) peptide patterns, using the quantitative Abeta-SDS-PAGE/immunoblot. Additionally, the novel electrochemiluminescence technique (MSD) was used to validate the measures on Abeta1-38. The main outcome measures were a striking decrease of Abeta1-42 in AD (P=7.4 x 10(-19)), and most interestingly a pronounced decrease of Abeta1-38 in FTD (P=9.6 x 10(-7)). Moreover, a novel peptide that most probably represents an oxidized alpha-helical form of Abeta1-40 (Abeta1-40(ox)) displayed a highly significant increase in DLB (P=3.7 x 10(-3)) as compared to non-demented disease controls. The overall diagnostic accuracy of percentage Abeta peptide abundances (Abeta1-X%) was clearly superior to absolute CSF Abeta levels. Abeta1-42% and Abeta1-38% enabled contrasts of 85% or beyond to distinguish AD and FTD, respectively, from all other investigated subjects. Abeta1-40(ox)% yielded a diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 73% for the detection of DLB among all other investigated patients. We found a strong correlation between Abeta1-38 levels as measured by the Abeta-SDS-PAGE/immunoblot and MSD, respectively. CSF Abeta peptides may reflect disease-specific impact of distinct neurodegenerative processes on Abeta peptide metabolism and represent a potential diagnostic biomarker for AD, FTD and DLB.
用于鉴别三种最常见的退行性痴呆形式,即阿尔茨海默病(AD)、路易体痴呆(DLB)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)的生物标志物,目前正在深入研究中,但仍缺乏针对FTD和DLB的疾病特异性生物标志物。我们分析了71例AD患者、32例DLB患者和36例FTD患者的303份脑脊液(CSF)样本,并与93例其他各种痴呆(OD)、20例周围神经疾病(PND)对照、25例无痴呆的神经退行性疾病(ND)以及26例有抑郁认知主诉(DCC)的患者进行比较,采用定量β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)肽SDS-PAGE/免疫印迹法检测不同的CSF Aβ肽模式。此外,还使用了新型电化学发光技术(MSD)来验证Aβ1-38的检测结果。主要观察指标为AD患者中Aβ1-42显著降低(P = 7.4×10⁻¹⁹),最有趣的是FTD患者中Aβ1-38显著降低(P = 9.6×10⁻⁷)。此外,一种最可能代表氧化α-螺旋形式的Aβ1-40(Aβ1-40(ox))的新型肽在DLB患者中与非痴呆疾病对照相比有高度显著增加(P = 3.7×10⁻³)。Aβ肽丰度百分比(Aβ1-X%)的总体诊断准确性明显优于CSF Aβ的绝对水平。Aβ1-42%和Aβ1-38%分别能够以85%或更高的对比度将AD和FTD与所有其他研究对象区分开来。Aβ1-40(ox)%在所有其他研究患者中检测DLB的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为88%和73%。我们发现分别通过Aβ-SDS-PAGE/免疫印迹法和MSD检测的Aβ1-38水平之间存在强相关性。CSF Aβ肽可能反映了不同神经退行性过程对Aβ肽代谢的疾病特异性影响,并代表了AD、FTD和DLB的潜在诊断生物标志物。