Aranda Mario, Morlock Gertrud
Institute of Food Chemistry, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 28, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21(7):1297-303. doi: 10.1002/rcm.2949.
A new high-performance thin-layer chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPTLC/ESI-MS) method for the quantification of caffeine in pharmaceutical and energy drink samples was developed using stable isotope dilution analysis (SIDA). After sample preparation, samples and caffeine standard were applied on silica gel 60 F254 HPTLC plates and over-spotted with caffeine-d3 used for correction of the plunger positioning. After chromatography, densitometric detection was performed by UV absorption at 274 nm. The bands were then eluted by means of a plunger-based extractor into the ESI interface of a single-quadrupole mass spectrometer. For quantification by MS the [M+H]+ ions of caffeine and caffeine-d3 were recorded in the positive ion single ion monitoring (SIM) mode at m/z 195 and 198, respectively. The calibration showed a linear regression with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.9998. The repeatability (RSD, n=6) in matrix was<or=+/-3.75%. The intermediate precisions (RSD, n=2) for two samples of different brand names were determined three times and ranged between RSD+/-0.68% and+/-2.64% (sample 1) and between+/-3.44% and+/-8.60% (sample 2). The method accuracy was evaluated by comparing the results obtained by HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS with those from the validated HPTLC/UV method. The results for pharmaceutical and energy drink samples were (ng/band) 99.82+/-3.75 and 338.09+/-4.87 by HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS and 104.74+/-1.51 and 334.86+/-5.63 by HPTLC/UV. According to the F-test (homogeneity of variances) and the t-test (comparison of means) the two methods show no significant difference. The detection and quantification limits were 75 and 250 microg L-1 (0.75 and 2.5 ng/band), respectively, which were a factor of 13 lower than those established for HPTLC/UV. The positioning error (RSD+/-6%) was calculated by comparing HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS with HPTLC/ESI-MS. However, using SIDA the positioning error was nullified. HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS was demonstrated to be a highly reliable method for the quantification of compounds by planar chromatography coupled online with mass spectrometry.
采用稳定同位素稀释分析(SIDA)开发了一种用于定量分析药品和能量饮料样品中咖啡因的新型高效薄层色谱/电喷雾电离质谱(HPTLC/ESI-MS)方法。样品制备后,将样品和咖啡因标准品点样于硅胶60 F254 HPTLC板上,并用氘代咖啡因(caffeine-d3)进行复点,用于校正进样针定位。色谱分离后,通过在274 nm处的紫外吸收进行光密度检测。然后用基于进样针的萃取器将条带洗脱至单四极杆质谱仪的ESI接口中。为通过质谱进行定量分析,分别在正离子单离子监测(SIM)模式下,于m/z 195和198处记录咖啡因和氘代咖啡因的[M+H]+离子。校准显示线性回归的决定系数(R2)为0.9998。基质中的重复性(RSD,n = 6)≤±3.75%。对两个不同品牌的样品进行了三次中间精密度(RSD,n = 2)测定,样品1的RSD在±0.68%至±2.64%之间,样品2的RSD在±3.44%至±8.60%之间。通过比较HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS与经过验证的HPTLC/UV方法获得的结果来评估方法的准确性。药品和能量饮料样品通过HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS测定的结果(ng/条带)为99.82±3.75和338.09±4.87,通过HPTLC/UV测定的结果为104.74±1.51和334.86±5.63。根据F检验(方差齐性)和t检验(均值比较),两种方法无显著差异。检测限和定量限分别为75和250 μg L-1(0.75和2.5 ng/条带),比HPTLC/UV方法确定的限值低13倍。通过比较HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS与HPTLC/ESI-MS计算定位误差(RSD±6%)。然而,使用SIDA可消除定位误差。HPTLC/SIDA-ESI-MS被证明是一种通过平面色谱与质谱在线联用对化合物进行定量分析的高度可靠方法。