Suppr超能文献

[不同委员会和个人在人类生殖新方法伦理立场中的作用]

[The role of different committees and individuals in the ethical position on the new methods of human reproduction].

作者信息

Lampé L, Bodnár B

机构信息

Debreceni Orvostudományi Egyetem Szülészeti, Nögyógyászati Klinika.

出版信息

Orv Hetil. 1992 Jan 5;133(1):5-9.

PMID:1734341
Abstract

Due to the research on assisted human reproduction and the application of its results we face new type ethical dilemma which had never existed before. The traditional system of ethical values does not provide a safe basis for judgement of our actions. One of the challenging questions is who has the right to authorize or prohibit performing different procedures. There might be necessary and justifiable taking into account the opinions of various bodies (professional committees, national and institutional ethical committees, religious bodies, parliamentary representatives and private organizations or persons). The authors introduce the activities of the role and importance of these bodies and investigate the position of the research and clinical professionals in obtaining permission for the application of ethically sound or less criticizable procedures. The importance of the provision of continuous and many-sided information for wide range of the society is underlined.

摘要

由于对人类辅助生殖的研究及其成果的应用,我们面临着前所未有的新型伦理困境。传统的伦理价值体系并未为评判我们的行为提供可靠依据。其中一个具有挑战性的问题是谁有权授权或禁止进行不同的程序。考虑到各种机构(专业委员会、国家和机构伦理委员会、宗教团体、议会代表以及私人组织或个人)的意见可能是必要且合理的。作者介绍了这些机构的作用和重要性的相关活动,并研究了研究人员和临床专业人员在获得应用符合伦理或较少受批评程序的许可方面的立场。强调了为广大社会提供持续且多方面信息的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验