Oliveira Antônio Carlos P, Bertollo Caryne M, Rocha Leonardo Tadeu S, Nascimento Elias B, Costa Karina A, Coelho Márcio M
Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antônio Carlos 6627 31270-91 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2007 Apr 30;561(1-3):194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.12.026. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPAR) are ligand-regulated transcription factors that control the expression of many genes. The antiinflammatory activity of fibrates, PPARalpha agonists, and thiazolidinediones, PPARgamma agonists, has been demonstrated in many in vitro and a few in vivo studies. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of acute (100 or 300 mg/kg, p.o.) or prolonged (100 or 300 mg/kg day, 7 days, p.o.) treatment with fenofibrate and acute treatment with pioglitazone (doses ranging from 1 to 50 mg/kg, i.p.), PPARalpha and PPARgamma agonists, respectively, on experimental models of nociception and edema, in order to expand the knowledge of their potential antiinflammatory activities. Fenofibrate and pioglitazone did not inhibit the nociceptive response in the hot-plate model and the first phase of formaldehyde induced nociceptive response in mice. However, treatment with pioglitazone and prolonged treatment with fenofibrate inhibited the second phase of this response. Mechanical allodynia induced by carrageenan in rats was inhibited by prolonged treatment with fenofibrate, but not by acute treatment with pioglitazone or fenofibrate. Both drugs inhibited paw edema induced by carrageenan in rats. Fenofibrate did not inhibit mechanical allodynia or paw edema induced by phorbol-12,13-didecanoate (PDD), a protein kinase C activator, in rats. Pioglitazone inhibited paw edema, but not mechanical allodynia, induced by PDD. The results represent the first demonstration of the antinociceptive and antiedematogenic activities of fenofibrate and pioglitazone and give further support to the potential use of PPAR agonists in the treatment of different inflammatory diseases.
过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(PPAR)是受配体调节的转录因子,可控制许多基因的表达。贝特类药物(PPARα激动剂)和噻唑烷二酮类药物(PPARγ激动剂)的抗炎活性已在许多体外研究和一些体内研究中得到证实。在本研究中,我们分别评估了非诺贝特急性(100或300 mg/kg,口服)或长期(100或300 mg/kg/天,7天,口服)治疗以及吡格列酮急性治疗(剂量范围为1至50 mg/kg,腹腔注射)对伤害感受和水肿实验模型的影响,以拓展对其潜在抗炎活性的认识。非诺贝特和吡格列酮在热板模型中未抑制伤害性反应,在小鼠甲醛诱导的伤害性反应的第一阶段也未抑制。然而,吡格列酮治疗和非诺贝特长期治疗抑制了该反应的第二阶段。角叉菜胶诱导的大鼠机械性异常性疼痛可被非诺贝特长期治疗抑制,但不能被吡格列酮或非诺贝特急性治疗抑制。两种药物均抑制了角叉菜胶诱导的大鼠爪部水肿。非诺贝特未抑制蛋白激酶C激活剂佛波醇-12,13-二癸酸酯(PDD)诱导的大鼠机械性异常性疼痛或爪部水肿。吡格列酮抑制了PDD诱导的爪部水肿,但未抑制机械性异常性疼痛。这些结果首次证明了非诺贝特和吡格列酮的抗伤害感受和抗水肿活性,并进一步支持了PPAR激动剂在治疗不同炎症性疾病中的潜在应用。