Csajbók Edit, Kranczicki Orsolya, Vasas Lívia
Semmelweis Egyetem Központi Könyvtár Budapest Ulloi út 26. 1085.
Orv Hetil. 2007 Jan 7;148(1):27-38. doi: 10.1556/OH.2007.27837.
The majority of scientific results from Hungarian Medical Universities are published in international periodicals in foreign languages.
This study shows that in what numbers, with what kind of impact factors and where the results of the scientific work in the Hungarian Medical Universities are published.
The examined period is between 2000 and 2003. These scientific publications were explored by two methods based on the own assembled bibliographies of the Hungarian medical universities - University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center, University of Pecs Medical School, University of Semmelweis and University of Szeged Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical and Pharmaceutical Center - and the Web of Science's recording.
The scientific publications from our medical universities are published in great number and generally with increasing impact factors to guarantee the international publicity for the Hungarian researches. The 90-95 percent of publications which are intended for international publicity is published in those international journals which have impact factor. Among these journals there are many prestigious ones.
Neither of the two methods which were used for exploring of publishing activity has decisive validity. The institutional reason for this is the insufficiency and the lack of precision of the bibliographies of the universities. In the authors' opinion it would be necessary to develop a uniform, electronic processing and take it over in each universities. So a national scientific database of medical universities would be created by joining these universities' databases.
匈牙利医科大学的大部分科研成果都发表在国外的国际期刊上。
本研究旨在揭示匈牙利医科大学科研工作的成果以何种数量、何种影响因子以及在何处发表。
研究时间段为2000年至2003年。这些科研出版物通过两种方法进行探究,一种基于匈牙利医科大学(德布勒森医科与健康科学中心大学、佩奇医科大学、塞梅维什大学以及塞格德大学阿尔伯特· Szent - Györgyi医学与制药中心)自行汇编的文献目录,另一种基于科学网的记录。
我们医科大学的科研出版物数量众多,且影响因子总体呈上升趋势,以确保匈牙利研究在国际上得到宣传。旨在进行国际宣传的出版物中有90% - 95%发表在那些具有影响因子的国际期刊上。在这些期刊中有许多颇具声望的刊物。
用于探究出版活动的两种方法都没有决定性的有效性。其制度原因在于各大学文献目录的不足和缺乏精确性。作者认为有必要开发一种统一的电子处理方式并在各大学推广。这样通过整合这些大学的数据库就可以创建一个全国性的医科大学科研数据库。