• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用不同手术入路全髋关节置换术后地面反作用力的测量]

[Measurement of ground reaction forces after total hip arthroplasty using different surgical approaches].

作者信息

Leuchte S, Luchs A, Wohlrab D

机构信息

Institut für Sportwissenschaft, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.

出版信息

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2007 Jan-Feb;145(1):74-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-960511.

DOI:10.1055/s-2007-960511
PMID:17345547
Abstract

AIM

Benefits of less damage of soft tissues and muscles in minimally invasive hip replacement lead to expectations of better results in gait rehabilitation. The aim of the study is to evaluate post-operative walking ability in terms of different surgical approaches.

METHOD

16 patients underwent a minimally invasive total hip replacement (MIS group) and 16 other patients got a THA using a transgluteal approach (standard group). Differences in functional indices of ground reaction forces and symmetry indices were measured one day pre-operatively as well as 8, 14 and 28 weeks post-operatively. The results were compared between the surgical approaches and to an age-matched healthy control group.

RESULTS

There are significantly reduced pain symptoms and a higher functional ability in both surgical groups 8 weeks post-operatively. There are no differences in gait parameters between the surgical groups after 28 weeks. Trends in gait velocity, temporal parameters and in functional indices of ground reaction forces show advantages for the minimally invasive group 8 and 14 weeks post-operatively. Patients do not reach the age-matched control group.

CONCLUSION

Obviously the immediate post-operative advantages of minimally invasive hip replacement provide better chances for gait rehabilitation compared to the transgluteal approach. Due to the complexity of the problem clinical and gait analysis studies should be linked more closely.

摘要

目的

微创髋关节置换术中软组织和肌肉损伤较小的益处引发了对步态康复能取得更好效果的期望。本研究的目的是根据不同手术入路评估术后行走能力。

方法

16例患者接受了微创全髋关节置换术(微创组),另外16例患者采用经臀入路进行全髋关节置换术(标准组)。在术前1天以及术后8周、14周和28周测量地面反作用力功能指标和对称性指标的差异。将手术入路之间的结果与年龄匹配的健康对照组进行比较。

结果

术后8周,两个手术组的疼痛症状均显著减轻,功能能力更高。28周后,手术组之间的步态参数没有差异。术后8周和14周,微创组在步态速度、时间参数和地面反作用力功能指标方面呈现优势。患者未达到年龄匹配的对照组水平。

结论

显然,与经臀入路相比,微创髋关节置换术的术后即时优势为步态康复提供了更好的机会。由于问题的复杂性,临床和步态分析研究应更紧密地联系起来。

相似文献

1
[Measurement of ground reaction forces after total hip arthroplasty using different surgical approaches].[使用不同手术入路全髋关节置换术后地面反作用力的测量]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2007 Jan-Feb;145(1):74-80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-960511.
2
[Immediate post-operative advantages of minimally invasive hip replacement - results of symmetry and load from the measurement of ground reaction force].[微创髋关节置换术后的即时优势——来自地面反作用力测量的对称性和负荷结果]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2009 Jan-Feb;147(1):69-78. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038856. Epub 2009 Mar 4.
3
[Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation].[微创全髋关节置换在康复早期阶段的优势]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2004 Nov-Dec;142(6):685-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832447.
4
[Evaluation of results after total hip replacement using a minimally invasive and a conventional approach. Clinical scores and gait analysis].[采用微创和传统方法进行全髋关节置换术后结果的评估。临床评分与步态分析]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2011 Apr;149(2):191-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250590. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
5
Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study.接受微创与传统髋关节置换手术患者的步态运动学比较:一项前瞻性盲法研究。
Gait Posture. 2006 Apr;23(3):374-82. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.04.008. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
6
A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis.一项关于全髋关节置换术中三种微创外科手术方法的随机前瞻性研究:综合步态分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6 Suppl 1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.014.
7
In vivo comparison of hip mechanics for minimally invasive versus traditional total hip arthroplasty.微创与传统全髋关节置换术的髋关节力学的体内比较。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008 Feb;23(2):127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.09.015. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
8
Surgical access and damage extent after total hip arthroplasty influence early gait pattern and guide rehabilitation treatment.全髋关节置换术后的手术入路和损伤程度会影响早期步态模式,并指导康复治疗。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Mar;47(1):9-17. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
[Minimally invasive total hip replacement--one-year results].[微创全髋关节置换术——一年结果]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2008 Aug;75(4):262-70.
10
[The gait of patients with full weightbearing capacity after hip prosthesis implantation on the treadmill with partial body weight support, during assisted walking and without crutches].[髋关节假体植入术后患者在部分体重支持下于跑步机上进行辅助行走且无需拐杖时的全负重步态]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1999 May-Jun;137(3):265-72. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1037405.

引用本文的文献

1
Possible load after initial implantation of a total hip arthroplasty (THA): comparison of minimal invasive anterolateral approach with direct lateral transgluteal approach according to Bauer.全髋关节置换术(THA)初次植入后的可能负荷:根据鲍尔方法对微创前外侧入路与直接外侧经臀入路的比较
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 25;35(1):131. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04250-3.
2
Cognitive representation of gait: differences in memory structures between individuals after total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.步态的认知表征:全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术后个体之间记忆结构的差异。
Cogn Process. 2025 May;26(2):423-433. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01255-4. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
影响微创全髋关节置换术结局的因素:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 May 18;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03168-4.
4
Nerve palsy, dislocation and revision rate among the approaches for total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术各入路的神经麻痹、脱位及翻修率:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Apr;105(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00662-y. Epub 2020 May 5.
5
Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials.全髋关节置换术:微创还是非微创?临床试验的荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
6
A prospective randomized peri- and post-operative comparison of the minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the lateral approach.微创前外侧入路与外侧入路的前瞻性随机围手术期及术后比较。
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Jul 24;5(3):e19. doi: 10.4081/or.2013.e19. eCollection 2013.
7
[Gait analysis after minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty].[微创全髋关节置换术后的步态分析]
Orthopade. 2012 May;41(5):365-76. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1891-6.
8
Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes.微创与传统入路全髋关节置换术的比较:临床和影像学结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2011 Feb;35(2):173-84. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1075-8. Epub 2010 Jun 18.