Paterson Brodie
Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Stirling.
Br J Nurs. 2006;15(22):1235-41. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2006.15.22.22562.
This article explores contemporary practice in the use of restraint in the light of recent European Council Guidance endorsing the principles of least restrictive environment/least intrusive intervention. Violence is a source of concern in many European mental health services but approaches to its immediate management continue to display remarkable diversity reflecting the adoption of differing perspectives on what constitutes 'least intrusiveness'. This article examines the basis for practice in terms of the range of procedures available, reviews the literature on restraint safety and presents a model based on the concept of reasonableness which can be used to evaluate whether a given intervention meets the European guidance. Current practice across Europe is largely a function of tradition and local values rather then evidence based. Collaborative large-scale studies are required to determine the relative risks of the range of interventions in use such that practice is informed by evidence rather than opinion.
本文根据欧洲理事会最近支持最低限制环境/最少侵入性干预原则的指导意见,探讨了当前使用约束措施的实践情况。暴力是许多欧洲心理健康服务机构关注的一个问题,但对其即时管理的方法仍然表现出显著的多样性,这反映出对什么构成“最少侵入性”存在不同的观点。本文从可用程序的范围方面审视了实践的基础,回顾了关于约束安全的文献,并提出了一个基于合理性概念的模型,该模型可用于评估特定干预措施是否符合欧洲的指导意见。欧洲各地目前的做法在很大程度上是传统和当地价值观的产物,而非基于证据。需要开展大规模合作研究,以确定所使用的一系列干预措施的相对风险,从而使实践以证据而非观点为依据。