City University, London, United Kingdom.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Jun;31(6):413-24. doi: 10.3109/01612840903484113.
This review examines the nature and effectiveness of interventions to reduce the use of mechanical restraint and seclusion among adult psychiatric inpatients. Thirty-six post-1960 empirical studies were identified. The interventions were diverse, but commonly included new restraint or seclusion policies, staffing changes, staff training, case review procedures, or crisis management initiatives. Most studies reported reduced levels of mechanical restraint and/or seclusion, but the standard of evidence was poor. The research did not address which programme components were most successful. More attention should be paid to understanding how interventions work, particularly from the perspective of nursing staff, an issue that is largely overlooked.
本综述考察了干预措施的性质和效果,这些措施旨在减少成年精神科住院患者使用机械约束和隔离。共确定了 36 项 1960 年后的实证研究。这些干预措施多种多样,但通常包括新的约束或隔离政策、人员配备变更、员工培训、案例审查程序或危机管理举措。大多数研究报告机械约束和/或隔离的水平有所降低,但证据标准较差。研究没有涉及哪些方案组成部分最成功。应更加关注了解干预措施的工作原理,特别是从护理人员的角度来看,这是一个很大程度上被忽视的问题。