Norman Richard P A, Evans D Gareth, Easton Douglas F, Young Kenneth C
Centre for Health Economic Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Eur J Health Econ. 2007 Jun;8(2):137-44. doi: 10.1007/s10198-007-0042-9. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
Recent evidence has investigated the cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in younger women with a BRCA1 mutation. However, this evidence has not been contrasted with existing cost-effectiveness standards to determine whether screening is appropriate, given limited societal resources. We constructed a Markov model investigating surveillance tools (mammography, MRI, both in parallel) under a National Health Service (NHS) perspective. The key benefit of MRI is that increased sensitivity leads to early detection, and improved prognosis. For a 30- to 39-year-old cohort, the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of mammography relative to no screening was 5,200 pounds. The addition of MRI to this costs 13,486 pounds per QALY. For a 40- to 49-year-old cohort, the corresponding values were 2,913 pounds and 7,781 pounds. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported the cost-effectiveness of the parallel approach of mammography and MRI. It is necessary to extend this analysis beyond BRCA1 carriers within this age group, and also to other age groups.
近期有证据对磁共振成像(MRI)在携带BRCA1突变的年轻女性中的成本效益进行了研究。然而,鉴于社会资源有限,尚未将此证据与现有的成本效益标准进行对比,以确定筛查是否合适。我们构建了一个马尔可夫模型,从英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)的角度研究监测工具(乳房X光检查、MRI、两者并行)。MRI的关键优势在于其更高的灵敏度可实现早期检测,并改善预后。对于30至39岁的人群,相对于不进行筛查,乳房X光检查每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本为5200英镑。在此基础上增加MRI,每QALY的成本为13486英镑。对于40至49岁的人群,相应数值分别为2913英镑和7781英镑。概率敏感性分析支持乳房X光检查和MRI并行方法的成本效益。有必要将此分析扩展至该年龄组内除BRCA1携带者之外的人群,以及其他年龄组。