Chandra Ankur, Suliman Ahmed, Angle Niren
Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92103-8402, USA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar;21(2):178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.10.020.
The etiology of spontaneous dissection of the carotid and vertebral arteries without antecedent trauma remains unclear. The goal of this 10-year review was to examine factors regarding presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome for all patients at our institution who were diagnosed with spontaneous carotid dissections (SCD) or spontaneous vertebral dissections (SVD) with no prior trauma history. A retrospective chart analysis was performed involving all discharges from UCSD Medical Center from 1995 to 2005. Patients were selected for inclusion based on the diagnosis of carotid or vertebral dissection with no associated traumatic or iatrogenic cause for their presentation. Characteristics of these patients' medical risk factors, presenting symptoms, diagnostic method and time, treatment, and outcomes were analyzed. A total of 20 patients (10 male, age 44.8 +/- 12.9 yrs; 10 female, age 39.6 +/- 14.9 yrs) were included for study. These patients represented 12 cases of SCD and nine SVD. On presentation, a majority of patients with both SVD and SCD reported headache as their primary complaint while a significantly higher rate of nausea (25% vs. 67%, p < 0.01) was reported in SVD. SVD was associated with a significantly longer diagnostic time (11 hr vs. 16 hr, p < 0.01). The most commonly performed diagnostic exam in both SCD and SVD was magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Anticoagulation was the primary treatment in 11 of 12 SCD and all nine SVD. One patient with persistent, symptomatic bilateral carotid dissection after anticoagulation was treated with stent placement resulting in unilateral intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Length of stay was significantly longer in SVD (5 d vs. 7 d, p < 0.02). A significantly higher incidence of persistent neurologic deficits on discharge was seen in SCD (71% vs. 33%, p < 0.02). Radiographic evidence of cerebral infarction on discharge had a stronger correlation with clinical deficits in SCD. Although there were only two cases, those treated with endovascular therapy in the setting of SCD suffered complications related to the intervention. On discharge, there did not seem to be a correlation between persistent neurologic deficits and radiographic evidence of infarction in SVD reflecting that recovery after these episodes may not be predictable based on the appearance of the infarction.
无前驱创伤情况下颈动脉和椎动脉自发性夹层的病因仍不清楚。这项为期10年的回顾性研究的目的是,调查我院所有诊断为自发性颈动脉夹层(SCD)或自发性椎动脉夹层(SVD)且无既往创伤史患者的临床表现、诊断、治疗及预后相关因素。对1995年至2005年加州大学圣地亚哥分校医学中心的所有出院病例进行回顾性图表分析。入选患者基于颈动脉或椎动脉夹层的诊断,且其临床表现无相关创伤或医源性病因。分析这些患者的医疗风险因素、临床表现、诊断方法及时间、治疗和预后特征。共纳入20例患者(男性10例,年龄44.8±12.9岁;女性10例,年龄39.6±14.9岁)进行研究。这些患者包括12例SCD和9例SVD。就诊时,大多数SVD和SCD患者均以头痛为主要主诉,而SVD患者恶心发生率显著更高(25%对67%,p<0.01)。SVD的诊断时间显著更长(11小时对16小时,p<0.01)。SCD和SVD最常用的诊断检查是磁共振血管造影(MRA)。抗凝是12例SCD中的11例和所有9例SVD的主要治疗方法。1例抗凝治疗后仍有持续性、有症状的双侧颈动脉夹层患者接受支架置入治疗,导致单侧颅内出血(ICH)。SVD患者住院时间显著更长(5天对7天,p<0.02)。SCD患者出院时持续性神经功能缺损发生率显著更高(71%对33%,p<0.02)。出院时脑梗死的影像学证据与SCD患者的临床缺损相关性更强。虽然仅2例,但SCD患者接受血管内治疗时出现了与干预相关的并发症。出院时,持续性神经功能缺损与SVD梗死影像学证据之间似乎无相关性,这表明这些发作后的恢复可能无法根据梗死表现预测。