Hadaegh F, Harati H, Ghasemi A, Tohidi M, Zabetian A, Mehrabi Y, Azizi F
Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 Sep;77(3):459-64. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.02.008. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
To identify a subgroup of individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) based on the new 2003 criteria that would most likely benefit from performance of oral glucose tolerance test.
A cross-sectional study was carried out in 1999-2001 in an Iranian urban population which enrolled 8766 individuals over 20 years. Fasting and 2-h plasma glucose was measured in all subjects after exclusion of diabetic subjects. Logistic regression and receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to determine the independent clinical risk factors and their optimal cut-points associated with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and dysglycemia (IGT or diabetes).
Application of the new criteria decreased positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of IFG for detecting IGT (from 6.68 to 3.86) or dysglycemia (from 9.90 to 4.46) but slightly improved their agreement (Kappa increased from 0.158 to 0.286 for IGT and 0.238 to 0.354 for dysglycemia). When the clinical data (age >45 years, BMI >28 kg/m(2) and systolic blood pressure >125 mm Hg) were added to the new criteria, the agreement of IFG with IGT and dysglycemia significantly improved (Kappa=0.470 and 0.574, respectively). This also increased the LR(+) to 14.5 and 17.4, respectively, for detecting IGT or dysglycemia.
The new IFG definition in combination with common clinical risk factors constitutes a group that most likely predicts IGT or dysglycemia and may be a target for which preventive strategies should be considered.
根据2003年新的标准确定空腹血糖受损(IFG)个体的一个亚组,该亚组最有可能从口服葡萄糖耐量试验中获益。
1999年至2001年在伊朗城市人群中进行了一项横断面研究,纳入了8766名20岁以上的个体。排除糖尿病患者后,对所有受试者测量空腹及餐后2小时血浆葡萄糖。采用逻辑回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来确定与糖耐量受损(IGT)和血糖异常(IGT或糖尿病)相关的独立临床危险因素及其最佳切点。
应用新标准降低了IFG检测IGT(从6.68降至3.86)或血糖异常(从9.90降至4.46)的阳性似然比(LR+),但略微改善了它们之间的一致性(IGT的Kappa值从0.158增加到0.286,血糖异常的Kappa值从0.238增加到0.354)。当将临床数据(年龄>45岁、BMI>28kg/m²和收缩压>125mmHg)添加到新标准中时,IFG与IGT和血糖异常的一致性显著改善(Kappa值分别为0.470和0.574)。这也分别将检测IGT或血糖异常的LR+增加到14.5和17.4。
新的IFG定义与常见临床危险因素相结合构成了一个最有可能预测IGT或血糖异常的群体,可能是应考虑采取预防策略的目标群体。