Suppr超能文献

冲动个体注意力变化的特定模式。

Specific pattern of attentional changes in impulsive individuals.

作者信息

Baylé Franck J, Daban Claire, Willard Dominique, Bourdel Marie-Chantal, Olié Jean-Pierre, Krebs Marie-Odile, Amado-Boccara Isabelle

机构信息

Université Paris V, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire de Santé Mentale et Thérapeutique, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2006 Sep;11(5):452-64. doi: 10.1080/13546800544000000.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although impulsivity is recognised as a major psychopathological feature, its cognitive correlates remain controversial. We evaluated readiness to act induced by a warning signal and attentional engagement in healthy impulsive participants.

METHODS

People with high impulsivity scores (HI) and low impulsivity (LI) scores on Barratt's Impulsivity Scale (BIS) were selected among 1250 students from top and bottom deciles. Subjects with personal or family of lifetime Axis I disorders were excluded. Motor preparation was evaluated by a Choice Reaction Time task (CRT) with a randomly presented warning signal with a delay before target of 500 ms or 2000 ms depending on the trial block. Attentional engagement and maintenance of fixation was evaluated by a Cued Target Detection task (CTD) comparing cued (valid, invalid, or double cue) and uncued trials and contrasting fixation offset (gap) or maintenance (overlap) conditions.

RESULTS

HI, but not LI participants had a shortened reaction time in the 2000 ms condition of CRT with warning signal, indicating a persistent readiness to act. In contrast to LI, HI showed a decreased reinforcement of attention in the overlap condition of CTD with a hyperreactivity to all types of visual stimuli.

CONCLUSIONS

Impulsivity per se appears to be associated with hyperreactivity to warning or cue signals and on inability to maintain attentional fixity.

摘要

引言

尽管冲动性被认为是一种主要的精神病理学特征,但其认知关联仍存在争议。我们评估了健康冲动性参与者中由警告信号诱发的行动准备情况和注意力投入。

方法

在1250名来自成绩排名前十分位和后十分位的学生中,选取了在巴拉特冲动性量表(BIS)上冲动性得分高(HI)和得分低(LI)的人。排除有个人或家族终生轴I障碍的受试者。通过选择反应时任务(CRT)评估运动准备情况,该任务会随机呈现警告信号,根据试验块的不同,目标出现前的延迟时间为500毫秒或2000毫秒。通过线索目标检测任务(CTD)评估注意力投入和注视维持情况,该任务比较线索(有效、无效或双线索)和无线索试验,并对比注视偏移(间隙)或维持(重叠)条件。

结果

在有警告信号的CRT的2000毫秒条件下,HI参与者而非LI参与者的反应时间缩短,表明其持续的行动准备状态。与LI参与者相比,HI参与者在CTD的重叠条件下注意力增强减少,对所有类型的视觉刺激反应过度。

结论

冲动性本身似乎与对警告或线索信号的反应过度以及无法维持注意力固定有关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验