• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在知觉类别学习中,刺激模态与类别结构相互作用。

Stimulus modality interacts with category structure in perceptual category learning.

作者信息

Maddox W Todd, Ing A David, Lauritzen J Scott

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas, 1 University Station A8000, Austin, TX 78712, USA.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1176-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03193719.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193719
PMID:17355041
Abstract

Two experiments were conducted that examined information integration and rule-based category learning, using stimuli that contained auditory and visual information. The results suggest that it is easier to perceptually integrate information within these sensory modalities than across modalities. Conversely, it is easier to perform a disjunctive rule-based task when information comes from different sensory modalities, rather than from the same modality. Quantitative model-based analyses suggested that the information integration deficit for across-modality stimulus dimensions was due to an increase in the use of hypothesis-testing strategies to solve the task and to an increase in random responding. The modeling also suggested that the across-modality advantage for disjunctive, rule-based category learning was due to a greater reliance on disjunctive hypothesis-testing strategies, as opposed to unidimensional hypothesis-testing strategies and random responding.

摘要

进行了两项实验,这些实验使用包含听觉和视觉信息的刺激来检验信息整合和基于规则的类别学习。结果表明,在这些感觉模态内进行信息的感知整合比跨模态整合更容易。相反,当信息来自不同的感觉模态而非相同模态时,执行基于析取规则的任务会更容易。基于定量模型的分析表明,跨模态刺激维度的信息整合缺陷是由于为解决任务而增加使用假设检验策略以及随机反应增加所致。建模还表明,基于析取规则的类别学习的跨模态优势是由于更依赖析取假设检验策略,而非一维假设检验策略和随机反应。

相似文献

1
Stimulus modality interacts with category structure in perceptual category learning.在知觉类别学习中,刺激模态与类别结构相互作用。
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1176-90. doi: 10.3758/bf03193719.
2
Cross-modal information integration in category learning.类别学习中的跨模态信息整合
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 Jul;76(5):1473-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0659-6.
3
Dual-task interference in perceptual category learning.感知类别学习中的双任务干扰。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):387-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03193416.
4
Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.特定模态的选择性注意会减弱多感官整合。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jan;184(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1080-3. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
5
Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning.延迟反馈对基于规则和信息整合类别学习的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Jul;29(4):650-62. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.650.
6
Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model.跨模态时间辨别:评估通用起搏器-计数器模型的预测
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Oct;68(7):1140-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03193716.
7
Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus.定向注意力会延长对短暂刺激的感知持续时间。
Percept Psychophys. 1998 Nov;60(8):1305-17. doi: 10.3758/bf03207993.
8
Comparing perceptual category learning across modalities in the same individuals.比较同一被试不同感觉通道的知觉类别学习。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Jun;28(3):898-909. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01878-0. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
9
Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.关注多个视觉流:基于位置和基于类别的注意力选择之间的相互作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1628-41. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21116.
10
Attentional bias between modalities: effect on the internal clock, memory, and decision stages used in animal time discrimination.不同感觉通道之间的注意偏向:对动物时间辨别中使用的内部时钟、记忆和决策阶段的影响。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1984;423:528-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23457.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Concurrent Auditory Working Memory Task in Auditory Category Learning.同时进行的听觉工作记忆任务在听觉类别学习中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 31;15(4):440. doi: 10.3390/bs15040440.
2
Generalisation to novel exemplars of learned shape categories based on visual and auditory spatial cues does not benefit from multisensory information.基于视觉和听觉空间线索对所学形状类别的新范例进行泛化,并不会从多感官信息中受益。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):417-429. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02548-7. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Linear separability, irrelevant variability, and categorization difficulty.
线性可分性、无关变异性和分类难度。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2022 Feb;48(2):159-172. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001000. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Procedural-Memory, Working-Memory, and Declarative-Memory Skills Are Each Associated With Dimensional Integration in Sound-Category Learning.程序性记忆、工作记忆和陈述性记忆技能在声音类别学习中均与维度整合相关。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 2;9:1828. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01828. eCollection 2018.
5
A role for consolidation in cross-modal category learning.巩固在跨模态类别学习中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 8;108:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
6
Performance Pressure Enhances Speech Learning.表现压力可增强言语学习。
Appl Psycholinguist. 2016 Nov;37(6):1369-1396. doi: 10.1017/S0142716415000600. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
7
A Comparison of the neural correlates that underlie rule-based and information-integration category learning.基于规则的类别学习和信息整合类别学习背后的神经关联比较。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Oct;37(10):3557-74. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23259. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
Incidental auditory category learning.偶然听觉类别学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1124-38. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000073. Epub 2015 May 25.
9
Individual differences in learning talker categories: the role of working memory.学习说话者类别中的个体差异:工作记忆的作用。
Phonetica. 2014;71(3):201-26. doi: 10.1159/000370160. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
10
The Role of Corticostriatal Systems in Speech Category Learning.皮质纹状体系统在言语类别学习中的作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1409-1420. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu236. Epub 2014 Oct 19.