Chang Tsang-Jung, Kao Hong-Ming, Hsieh Yi-Fang
Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2007 Feb;57(2):179-89. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2007.10465311.
An indoor size-dependent particulate matter (PM) transport approach is developed to investigate coarse PM (PM10), fine PM (PM2.5), and very fine PM (PM1) removal behaviors in a ventilated partitioned indoor environment. The approach adopts the Eulerian large eddy simulation of turbulent flow and the Lagrangian particle trajectory tracking to solve the continuous airflow phase and the discrete particle phase, respectively. Model verification, including sensitivity tests of grid resolution and particle numbers, is conducted by comparison with the full-size experiments conducted previously. Good agreement with the measured mass concentrations is found. Numerical scenario simulations of the effect of ventilation patterns on PM removal are performed by using three common ventilation patterns (piston displacement, mixing, and cross-flow displacement ventilation) with a measured indoor PM10 profile in the Taipei metropolis as the initial condition. The temporal variations of suspended PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 mass concentrations and particle removal mechanisms are discussed. The simulated results show that for all the of the three ventilation patterns, PM2.5 and PM1 are much more difficult to remove than PM10. From the purpose of health protection for indoor occupants, it is not enough to only use the PM10 level as the indoor PM index. Indoor PM2.5 and PM1 levels should be also considered. Cross-flow displacement ventilation is more effective to remove all PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 than the other ventilation patterns. Displacement ventilation would result in more escaped particles and less deposited particles than mixing ventilation.
开发了一种室内颗粒物(PM)传输方法,该方法与尺寸相关,用于研究通风分隔室内环境中粗颗粒物(PM10)、细颗粒物(PM2.5)和超细颗粒物(PM1)的去除行为。该方法分别采用欧拉大涡模拟湍流和拉格朗日粒子轨迹跟踪来求解连续气流相和离散颗粒相。通过与之前进行的全尺寸实验进行比较,进行了模型验证,包括网格分辨率和粒子数量的敏感性测试。发现与实测质量浓度吻合良好。以台北市实测的室内PM10分布为初始条件,采用三种常见通风模式(活塞置换通风、混合通风和错流置换通风)对通风模式对PM去除效果进行了数值情景模拟。讨论了悬浮PM10、PM2.5和PM1质量浓度的时间变化以及颗粒去除机制。模拟结果表明,对于所有三种通风模式,PM2.5和PM1比PM10更难去除。从保护室内居住者健康的目的来看,仅将PM10水平作为室内PM指标是不够的。还应考虑室内PM2.5和PM1水平。错流置换通风比其他通风模式更有效地去除所有PM10、PM2.5和PM1。与混合通风相比,置换通风会导致更多的颗粒逃逸和更少的颗粒沉积。