Ranson David
Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine.
J Law Med. 2007 Feb;14(3):315-8.
Safety in health care has increasingly become a key focus of health care providers. Data on "patient outcomes" and evidence-based clinical decision-making have led to real changes in health care policy and care provision. Specialist groups such as the National Patient Safety Agency which operates the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) in the United Kingdom are reliant on good information in order to identify factors that lead to poor patient care. In a recent study the NCEPOD reviewed the quality of coroners' autopsy reports on which they rely for much of their core data. The study found that just over half of the reports (52%) were considered satisfactory by the reviewers, 19% were good and 4% were excellent. However, over a quarter of autopsies were marked as poor or of an unacceptable standard. While analysing the factors associated with poor-quality autopsies, comments and recommendations were made with regard to the processes of death investigation and the degree to which the coroner's death investigation meets the needs of health care services.
医疗保健中的安全问题日益成为医疗保健提供者关注的重点。关于“患者预后”的数据以及循证临床决策已切实推动了医疗保健政策和医疗服务的变革。诸如英国国家患者安全局这类专业组织,其负责开展全国患者预后与死亡保密调查(NCEPOD),它们依赖优质信息来识别导致患者护理不佳的因素。在最近一项研究中,NCEPOD审查了死因裁判官尸检报告的质量,其大部分核心数据都依赖于此。研究发现,略超半数的报告(52%)被评审人员评为满意,19%为良好,4%为优秀。然而,超过四分之一的尸检被标记为质量差或不符合标准。在分析与低质量尸检相关的因素时,针对死亡调查流程以及死因裁判官的死亡调查满足医疗服务需求的程度提出了意见和建议。