• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚人寿保险行业的基因歧视调查:1999 - 2003年基因检测结果在承保中的应用

Investigating genetic discrimination in the Australian life insurance sector: the use of genetic test results in underwriting, 1999-2003.

作者信息

Otlowski Margaret, Barlow-Stewart Kristine, Taylor Sandra, Stranger Mark, Treloar Susan

机构信息

Centre for Law and Genetics, Faculty of Law, Private Bag 89, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas 7000, Australia.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2007 Feb;14(3):367-96.

PMID:17355100
Abstract

A major component of the Genetic Discrimination Project (GDP), an Australia-wide study to examine the advantages and disadvantages for individuals of having genetic information and cases of alleged genetic discrimination, is the analysis of insurers' use of genetic test results. The peak life insurance body, IFSA, had collected data through the Australian Institute of Actuaries (AIA) for the period June 1999-May 2003 from life insurance companies in Australia regarding their use of genetic test results in insurance underwriting. The GDP negotiated with IFSA and the AIA for access to this data for independent analysis. Applications from 288 individuals who had disclosed a genetic test result included products for cover for death, trauma/crisis, income protection/disability and total and permanent disablement. A total of 81% (234/288) contained usable data for analysis. These cases involved the genetic conditions haemochromatosis (71%), Huntington disease (12%) and breast/ovarian cancer (6%). In 49% of cases, the genetic test result was described as the only influencing factor and of these, 32% involved a "positive" genetic test result. Whilst underwriting in most cases appeared to be reasonable, the article highlights several cases involving disclosure of a positive predictive test result for breast/ovarian cancer that required further investigation.

摘要

基因歧视项目(GDP)是一项全澳大利亚范围的研究,旨在探讨拥有基因信息对个人的利弊以及所谓的基因歧视案例,其一个主要组成部分是分析保险公司对基因检测结果的使用情况。澳大利亚寿险行业的代表机构,即澳大利亚金融服务协会(IFSA),通过澳大利亚精算师协会(AIA)收集了1999年6月至2003年5月期间澳大利亚寿险公司在保险承保中使用基因检测结果的数据。基因歧视项目与澳大利亚金融服务协会和澳大利亚精算师协会协商获取这些数据以进行独立分析。288名披露了基因检测结果的个人的申请涵盖了死亡、创伤/危机、收入保障/残疾以及完全和永久残疾等险种。共有81%(234/288)的申请包含可供分析的可用数据。这些案例涉及遗传性血色素沉着症(71%)、亨廷顿舞蹈症(12%)和乳腺癌/卵巢癌(6%)等基因疾病。在49%的案例中,基因检测结果被描述为唯一的影响因素,其中32%涉及“阳性”基因检测结果。虽然大多数情况下的承保似乎是合理的,但本文强调了几起涉及披露乳腺癌/卵巢癌阳性预测检测结果的案例,这些案例需要进一步调查。

相似文献

1
Investigating genetic discrimination in the Australian life insurance sector: the use of genetic test results in underwriting, 1999-2003.澳大利亚人寿保险行业的基因歧视调查:1999 - 2003年基因检测结果在承保中的应用
J Law Med. 2007 Feb;14(3):367-96.
2
Implications of genetic testing: discrimination in life insurance and future directions.基因检测的影响:人寿保险中的歧视及未来方向。
J Law Med. 2003 May;10(4):470-87.
3
Genetic discrimination: meeting the challenges of an emerging issue.基因歧视:应对一个新出现问题的挑战。
Univ N S W Law J. 2003;26(3):764-9.
4
Genetic information and life insurance: a 'real' risk?遗传信息与人寿保险:一种“真实”的风险?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2003 Aug;11(8):561-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200998.
5
Verification of consumers' experiences and perceptions of genetic discrimination and its impact on utilization of genetic testing.对消费者关于基因歧视的经历和认知及其对基因检测利用的影响进行验证。
Genet Med. 2009 Mar;11(3):193-201. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e318194ee75.
6
Essentially yours: the protection of human genetic information in Australia.
Genewatch. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):9-12.
7
Investigating genetic discrimination in Australia: opportunities and challenges in the early stages.澳大利亚的基因歧视调查:早期阶段的机遇与挑战
New Genet Soc. 2004 Aug;23(2):225-39. doi: 10.1080/1463677042000237053.
8
Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Genetic Testing and Personal Insurance Products in Australia.澳大利亚人类遗传学会立场声明:澳大利亚的基因检测与个人保险产品
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2018 Dec;21(6):533-537. doi: 10.1017/thg.2018.60. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
9
Genetic testing in insurance underwriting: a blessing or a curse? An examination of the tension between economics and equity in using genetic testing in risk classification.保险承保中的基因检测:是福还是祸?审视在风险分类中使用基因检测时经济与公平之间的矛盾。
Creighton Law Rev. 1992 Jun;25(4):1499-535.
10
Is genetic information relevantly different from other kinds of non-genetic information in the life insurance context?在人寿保险背景下,基因信息与其他种类的非基因信息是否存在显著差异?
J Med Ethics. 2008 Jul;34(7):548-51. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.023101.

引用本文的文献

1
Future implications of polygenic risk scores for life insurance underwriting.多基因风险评分对人寿保险承保的未来影响。
NPJ Genom Med. 2024 Mar 30;9(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41525-024-00407-x.
2
Community concerns about genetic discrimination in life insurance persist in Australia: A survey of consumers offered genetic testing.澳大利亚的消费者在提供基因检测后,对寿险中的基因歧视仍存在担忧:一项消费者调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):286-294. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01373-1. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
Study protocol: the Australian genetics and life insurance moratorium-monitoring the effectiveness and response (A-GLIMMER) project.
研究方案:澳大利亚遗传学与寿险暂缓—监测效果与反应(A-GLIMMER)项目。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 May 21;22(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00634-2.
4
Massively Parallel Sequencing for Rare Genetic Disorders: Potential and Pitfalls.大规模平行测序在罕见遗传病中的应用:潜在价值与陷阱。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 19;11:628946. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.628946. eCollection 2020.
5
Genetic discrimination by Australian insurance companies: a survey of consumer experiences.澳大利亚保险公司的基因歧视:消费者体验调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Jan;28(1):108-113. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0426-1. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Comparative perspectives: regulating insurer use of genetic information.比较视角:规范保险公司对遗传信息的使用
Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Mar;27(3):340-348. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0293-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
7
How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?澳大利亚寿险公司如何使用基因检测结果?
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Sep;26(9):1248-1256. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0198-z. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
8
Should Australia Ban the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance?澳大利亚应该禁止在人寿保险中使用基因检测结果吗?
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 13;5:330. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00330. eCollection 2017.
9
Genetic discrimination and life insurance: a systematic review of the evidence.遗传歧视与寿险:证据的系统回顾。
BMC Med. 2013 Jan 31;11:25. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-25.
10
You never call, you never write: why return of 'omic' results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative.你从不打电话,也从不写信:为什么向研究参与者反馈“组学”结果既是个好主意,也是一项道德义务。
Per Med. 2011 Nov;8(6):651-657. doi: 10.2217/pme.11.62.